Misplaced Pages

Talk:Nevillean theory of Shakespeare authorship

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ian.thomson (talk | contribs) at 03:04, 8 April 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:04, 8 April 2016 by Ian.thomson (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Sources that help establish notability and should be incorporated for neutrality

Hope, Warren; Holston, Kim (2009). The Shakespeare Controversy: An Analysis of the Authorship Theories (2nd. ed.). McFarland. pp. 128-129. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Edmondson, Paul; Wells, Stanley (2013). Shakespeare Beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument, Controversy. Cambridge UP. pp. 54-60. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Carnegie, David; Taylor, Gary (2012). The Quest for Cardenio: Shakespeare, Fletcher, Cervantes, and the Lost Play. Oxford UP. pp. 67-69. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Two of these I found accidentally while trying to find anything else by the publisher of The Truth Will Out, so I'm curious as to why they haven't appeared yet. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)