This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ian.thomson (talk | contribs) at 03:05, 8 April 2016 (→Sources that help establish notability and should be incorporated for neutrality). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:05, 8 April 2016 by Ian.thomson (talk | contribs) (→Sources that help establish notability and should be incorporated for neutrality)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Sources that help establish notability and should be incorporated for neutrality
- Hope, Warren; Holston, Kim (2009). The Shakespeare Controversy: An Analysis of the Authorship Theories (2nd. ed.). McFarland. pp. 128-129.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help)
- Edmondson, Paul; Wells, Stanley (2013). Shakespeare Beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument, Controversy. Cambridge UP. pp. 54-60.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help)
- Carnegie, David; Taylor, Gary (2012). The Quest for Cardenio: Shakespeare, Fletcher, Cervantes, and the Lost Play. Oxford UP. pp. 67-69.
{{cite book}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help)
Two of these I found accidentally while trying to find anything else by the publisher of The Truth Will Out, so I'm curious as to why they haven't appeared yet. @RalphWinwood: how did you not find these? Or if you did, why did you not incorporate them? Ian.thomson (talk) 03:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)