This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Serial Number 54129 (talk | contribs) at 16:18, 18 May 2016 (→Since you are awake: Zactly). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:18, 18 May 2016 by Serial Number 54129 (talk | contribs) (→Since you are awake: Zactly)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives | ||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
The Signpost: 17 May 2016
- Op-ed: Swiss chapter in turmoil
- In the media: Wikimedia's Dario Taraborelli quoted on Google's Knowledge Graph in The Washington Post
- Featured content: Two weeks for the prize of one
- Traffic report: Oh behave, Beyhive / Underdogs
- Arbitration report: "Wikicology" ends in site ban; evidence and workshop phases concluded for "Gamaliel and others"
- Wikicup: That's it for WikiCup Round 2!
Since you are awake
Could you take a look at Jimbo's talkpage - an IP is editwarring in mentions of Jimbo's children. Without speaking to him directly I am going on a presumptive he probably does not want their names broadcast to the wiki-world. Protection would be appreciated. Only in death does duty end (talk) 15:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Protected, IP blocked. BethNaught (talk) 15:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. No comment on socking - my concern was strictly BLP/Childprotection issues. I'm going to refactor out the remaining name from others comments (and replace with 'your daughter') as they are a non-notable person. If Jimbo wants to make a comment and revert it later he is welcome. Only in death does duty end (talk) 15:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well, it was socking, and that's an easier reason to use for protection here, but I do see the safety issue, and thank you for looking at it. BethNaught (talk) 16:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ah yes, but absent an SPI I do not have the authority as a standard user to break 3rr based on the duck test. BLP removals are exempt however ;) Only in death does duty end (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- My thinking exactly :) Fortuna 16:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ah yes, but absent an SPI I do not have the authority as a standard user to break 3rr based on the duck test. BLP removals are exempt however ;) Only in death does duty end (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well, it was socking, and that's an easier reason to use for protection here, but I do see the safety issue, and thank you for looking at it. BethNaught (talk) 16:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. No comment on socking - my concern was strictly BLP/Childprotection issues. I'm going to refactor out the remaining name from others comments (and replace with 'your daughter') as they are a non-notable person. If Jimbo wants to make a comment and revert it later he is welcome. Only in death does duty end (talk) 15:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)