Misplaced Pages

Damiano Defence

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Banedon (talk | contribs) at 07:24, 26 May 2016 (History: Very slight expansion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 07:24, 26 May 2016 by Banedon (talk | contribs) (History: Very slight expansion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Chess opening
Damiano Defence
abcdefgh
8a8 black rookb8 black knightc8 black bishopd8 black queene8 black kingf8 black bishopg8 black knighth8 black rooka7 black pawnb7 black pawnc7 black pawnd7 black pawng7 black pawnh7 black pawnf6 black pawne5 black pawne4 white pawnf3 white knighta2 white pawnb2 white pawnc2 white pawnd2 white pawnf2 white pawng2 white pawnh2 white pawna1 white rookb1 white knightc1 white bishopd1 white queene1 white kingf1 white bishoph1 white rook8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Moves1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6
ECOC40
Named afterPedro Damiano
ParentKing's Knight Opening

The Damiano Defence is a chess opening beginning with the moves:

  1. e4 e5
  2. Nf3 f6?

The defence is one of the oldest chess openings, with games dating back to the 16th century.

The ECO code for the Damiano Defence is C40 (King's Knight Opening).

This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.

3.d4 and 3.Bc4

Black's 2...f6? is a weak move that exposes Black's king, weakens Black's kingside and takes away his knight's best square. The moves 3.d4 and 3.Bc4 are strong replies; I.A. Horowitz wrote (substituting algebraic notation for his descriptive notation), "Simple and potent is 3.Bc4 d6 4.d4 Nc6 5.c3, after which Black chokes to death."

3.Nxe5!

abcdefgh
8a8 black rookb8 black knightc8 black bishopd8 black queenf8 black bishopg8 black knighth8 black rooka7 black pawnb7 black pawnc7 black pawng7 black pawng6 black kingh6 black pawnd5 white bishope5 white queene4 white pawnh4 white pawna2 white pawnb2 white pawnc2 white pawnd2 white pawnf2 white pawng2 white pawna1 white rookb1 white knightc1 white bishope1 white kingh1 white rook8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 8...h6?. After 9.Bxb7!, 9...Bxb7?? fails to 10.Qf5#, so White wins the a8 Rook and gains a commanding lead in material.

Most forceful, however, is the knight sacrifice 3.Nxe5! Taking the knight with 3...fxe5? exposes Black to a deadly attack after 4.Qh5+ Ke7 (4...g6 loses to 5.Qxe5+, forking king and rook) 5.Qxe5+ Kf7 6.Bc4+ d5! (6...Kg6?? 7.Qf5+ is devastating and leads to mate shortly after) 7.Bxd5+ Kg6 8.h4 (8.d4? Bd6!) h5 (for 8...h6, see diagram) 9.Bxb7! Bd6 (9...Bxb7 10.Qf5+ Kh6 11.d4+ g5 12.Qf7! mates quickly) 10.Qa5!, when Black's best is 10...Nc6 11.Bxc6 Rb8, and now White will be ahead by several pawns. Bruce Pandolfini notes that Black's opening is thus sometimes described as "the five pawns gambit". Alternatively, White can continue developing his pieces, remaining four pawns up. In either case, White has a clearly winning position.

Since taking the knight is fatal, after 3.Nxe5 Black should instead play 3...Qe7! (other Black third moves, such as 3...d5, lead to 4. Qh5+! g6 5. Nxg6!). After 4.Nf3 (4.Qh5+? g6 5.Nxg6 Qxe4+ 6.Be2 Qxg6 leaves Black ahead a piece for a pawn) Qxe4+ 5.Be2, Black has regained the pawn but has lost time and weakened his kingside, and will lose more time when White chases the queen with Nc3, or 0-0, Re1, and a move by the bishop on e2. Nick de Firmian in Modern Chess Openings analyzes instead 4...d5 5.d3 dxe4 6.dxe4, when White had a small advantage in SchiffersChigorin, St. Petersburg 1897.

The fact that Black can only regain the pawn with 3...Qe7! shows that 2...f6? did not really defend the e-pawn at all. Indeed, even a relatively useless move like 2...a6?! is less risky than 2...f6?. After 2...a6?! 3.Nxe5, Black could still regain the pawn with 3...Qe7 4.d4 d6, when he would have done so without weakening his kingside or depriving the king's knight of its best square.

History

abcdefgh
8a8 black rooke8 black kingf8 black bishopg8 black knighth8 black rooka7 black pawnb7 black pawnc7 black pawnd7 black bishopg7 black pawnh7 black pawnc6 black knightf6 black pawng6 black queene5 white knightc3 white knighta2 white pawnb2 white pawnc2 white pawne2 white bishopf2 white pawng2 white pawnh2 white pawna1 white rookc1 white bishopd1 white queenf1 white rookg1 white king8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 10.Ne5!, White wins Black's queen. If the Knight is captured, 11. Bh5 pins the queen to the king, while 10...Qf5 leads to 11. Bg4 and the queen is trapped (11...Qxe5 12. Qxd7#).

Ironically, the opening is named after the Portuguese master Pedro Damiano (1480–1544), who condemned it as weak. In 1847, Howard Staunton wrote of 2...f6, "This move occurs in the old work of Damiano, who gives some ingenious variations on it. Lopez, and later authors, have hence entitled it 'Damiano's Gambit'." Staunton's contemporary George Walker instead, more logically, reserved the term "Damiano Gambit" for the knight sacrifice played by White on the third move: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5. Staunton referred to 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6, a highly respected move then and now, as "Damiano's defence to the K. Kt.'s opening".

The Damiano Defence is never seen today in top-level play. The greatest player to play the Damiano in serious master competition was Mikhail Chigorin. As noted above, he played the 3...Qe7 line in a game against Emmanuel Schiffers at Saint Petersburg 1897. Chigorin lost his queen on move 10 (see diagram), but Schiffers played so weakly that Chigorin later missed a brilliant forced mate and only escaped when Schiffers agreed to a draw in a winning position. Robert McGregor played the Damiano in a 1964 simultaneous exhibition against Bobby Fischer, essaying 3...Qe7 4.Nf3 d5 5.d3 dxe4 6.dxe4 Qxe4+ 7.Be2 Bf5, and drew, although Fischer did not play the best moves.

References

  1. I.A. Horowitz, Chess Openings: Theory and Practice, Simon and Schuster, 1964, p. 227 n. 31.
  2. Understanding the Chess Openings, Sam Collins, 2005, p. 28.
  3. Bruce Pandolfini, Chess Openings: Traps and Zaps, Simon & Schuster, 1989, p. 92. ISBN 0-671-65690-2.
  4. ^ Pandolfini 1989, p. 91.
  5. Modern Chess Openings, 15th Edition, Random House Puzzles & Games, 2008, p. 156. ISBN 978-0-8129-3682-7.
  6. Howard Staunton, The Chess-Player's Handbook, Henry C. Bohn, 1847, p. 60.
  7. Walker wrote of the knight sacrifice, "This constitutes the Damiano Gambit." George Walker, The Art of Chess-Play: A New Treatise on the Game of Chess (4th ed. 1846), Sherwood, Gilbert, & Piper, p. 236.
  8. Staunton, p. 64.
  9. "The Richter riddle". OPEN CHESS DIARY (scroll down to No. 222). Retrieved 2006-03-20.
  10. Bobby Fischer and Damiano's Defense. Chessstuff.blogspot.com. Retrieved on 2009-04-02.

External links

  • "Defeating Damiano's Defense". The Kenilworthian. 2010-07-28. Retrieved 2012-07-20. A comprehensive list of material available online about Damiano's Defense.
Categories: