Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FeatherPluma (talk | contribs) at 08:50, 30 May 2016 (→Criticism of educational evaluation: wp:undue, basically a wp:cfork). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (September 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Educational evaluation is the evaluation process of characterizing and appraising some aspect/s of an educational process.

There are two common purposes in educational evaluation which are, at times, in conflict with one another. Educational institutions usually require evaluation data to demonstrate effectiveness to funders and other stakeholders, and to provide a measure of performance for marketing purposes. Educational evaluation is also a professional activity that individual educators need to undertake if they intend to continuously review and enhance the learning they are endeavoring to facilitate.

Purpose for educational evaluation

The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation published three sets of standards for educational evaluations. The Personnel Evaluation Standards was published in 1988, The Program Evaluation Standards (2nd edition) was published in 1994, and The Student Evaluations Standards was published in 2003.

Each publication presents and elaborates a set of standards for use in a variety of educational settings. The standards provide guidelines for designing, implementing, assessing and improving the identified form of evaluation. Each of the standards has been placed in one of four fundamental categories to promote evaluations that are proper, useful, feasible, and accurate.

The Personnel Evaluation Standards

• The propriety standards require that evaluations be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of evaluatees and clients involved.
• The utility standards are intended to guide evaluations so that they will be informative, timely, and influential.
• The feasibility standards call for evaluation systems that are as easy to implement as possible, efficient in their use of time and resources, adequately funded, and viable from a number of other standpoints.
• The accuracy standards require that the obtained information be technically accurate and that conclusions be linked logically to the data.

The Program Evaluation Standards

• The utility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users.
• The feasibility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal.
• The propriety standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of those involved in the evaluation, as well as those affected by its results.
• The accuracy standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will reveal and convey technically adequate information about the features that determine worth or merit of the program being evaluated.

The Student Evaluation Standards

• The Propriety standards help and ensure that student evaluations are conducted lawfully, ethically, and with regard to the rights of students and other persons affected by student evaluation.
• The Utility standards promote the design and implementation of informative, timely, and useful student evaluations.
• The Feasibility standards help ensure that student evaluations are practical; viable; cost-effective; and culturally, socially, and politically appropriate.
• The Accuracy standards help ensure that student evaluations will provide sound, accurate, and credible information about student learning and performance.

See also

• Alternative assessment
• Classroom walkthrough
• Competency evaluation
• Criterion-referenced test
• Design Focused Evaluation
• Evaluation methods and techniques
• Grading
• Knowledge survey
• Norm-referenced test
• Performance evaluation
• Program evaluation
• Standardized testing
• Standardized testing and public policy
• Teacher quality assessment
• Washington County Closed-Circuit Educational Television Project

Notes

1. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988). The Personnel Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Systems for Evaluating Educators. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards, 2nd Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2003). The Student Evaluation Standards: How to Improve Evaluations of Students. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

References

External links

• OECD's Education GPS: a review of education policy analysis and statistics. Policy analysis in evaluation and quality assurance

• American Evaluation Association
  • Topical interest groups (TIGs)
    • Assessment in Higher Education
    • Distance Education and Other Educational Technologies
    • Extension Education Evaluation
    • Graduate Student and New Evaluators
    • PreK-12 Educational Evaluation
    • Teaching of Evaluation
• American Educational Research Association
  • Division H School Evaluation & Program Development
  • Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing
• Assessment in Higher Education web site.
• Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation
• The EvaluationWiki - The mission of EvaluationWiki is to make freely available a compendium of up-to-date information and resources to everyone involved in the science and practice of evaluation. The EvaluationWiki is presented by the non-profit Evaluation Resource Institute.
• Wisconsin Center for Education Research

• Educational administration
• Educational assessment and evaluation
• Educational psychology
• Evaluation
• Evaluation methods