Misplaced Pages

Talk:Star Wars (film)/to do

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Star Wars (film)

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Filmaker (talk | contribs) at 14:57, 28 August 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:57, 28 August 2006 by The Filmaker (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
  • Roger Ebert's review of Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope
  • James Berardinelli's review of Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope
  • In depth review of Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope on Filmsite
  • Acquire copyedits.
  • As another example, we later have a paragraph that begins, egregiously: "1958 Kurosawa film The Hidden Fortress was a strong influence, many elements are included such as the two bickering peasants (who evolved into C-3PO and R2-D2), elements of the Obi-Wan/Luke relationship and the Darth Vader-like evil general wears a kamon, commonly called simply a 'mon', a Japanese family crest similar to the Imperial Crest."
  • As a final example, chosen virtually at random, examine the first sentence of the "Reaction" section: "Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope debuted in 37 theaters and broke 36 house records, and effectively become the very first blockbuster film."
  • This is untrue (Star Wars was by no reasonable reckoning the "first blockbuster film"), awkwardly stated (what does it mean to be, not the "first" or even the "very first," but "effectively the very first"?), and misspelled ("become"?!).
  • Create the Videogames section
  • Resubmit for GA