• view
• talk
• edit

Misplaced Pages files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items

Misplaced Pages files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 8 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 91 items

Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently

In his 2023 book chapter Paradigms of Cyberculturalism in Post-postmodernity, scholar Mehdi Ghasemi introduces "Cyberculturalism" as a successor to postmodernism, arguing that contemporary society has entered a new artistic, literary, social, media, and economic period. He posits that cyberculture dominates at the intersection of real and virtual spaces, influencing literary and artistic production, publication methods, communication, and economic systems. Ghasemi identifies key paradigms of cyberculturalism, including artificial intelligence, multimediality, social media omnipresence, Twitterature, cybercommerce, and cryptocurrency, which impact art, culture, and economics.

In his 2022 paper Post-postmodernism and the Emergence of Heterolinational Literatures, Ghasemi introduces "Heterolinationalism" as another post-postmodernist paradigm. He explores concepts such as post-academia, postnationalism, polyliterature, polyvocalism, plurilingualism, self-publishing, social media, multimediality, transtextuality, and fanfiction as defining features of heterolinational literatures.

In his 2020 paper Hyperhybridism: Postmodernism is Old but not Old Fashioned, Ghasemi introduces "Hyperhybridism," which he describes as a post-postmodernist phenomenon coexisting with postmodernism. He characterizes hyperhybridism as multidirectional, recalibrating some of postmodernism's foundational assumptions while synchronously engaging with its predecessor.

References

1. Ghasemi, Mehdi (2023). Paradigms of Cyberculturalism in Post-postmodernity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Ghasemi, Mehdi (2022). "Post-postmodernism and the Emergence of Heterolinational Literatures". Contemporary Aesthetics. 20.
3. Ghasemi, Mehdi (2020). "Hyperhybridism: Postmodernism is Old but not Old Fashioned". Academia Philosophical Studies. 65.

Autopatrolled

User:Aidillia

• Aidillia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights

Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created here! :) Aidillia 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) In Buried Hearts, there's a bit of mess with the history, seeing that it was first deleted but later recreated and then expanded, this time, with copyright violations which remained not until GreenLipstickLesbian fixed and requested a revision deletion today. Checking through some other creations revealed some issues like grammar errors. Things like these are what the NPP is for, and English Misplaced Pages is not ready to keep copyvios on the site, not ever.

It also appears to be that Labor Attorney Noh Moo-jin had copyvio issues, which GLL fixed too. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, I don't know if translating from a website is forbidden, because a few months ago, there was someone who reverted my edit because of no reliable sources for the description I wrote myself. So after that, what was included in the sources I used. Many people I see do that. And now I know I'm trying to remove it as much as possible and do some fixing. Aidillia 11:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. Thanks for your interest in the permission, but the copyvio occurred last week and is a serious concern. I don't quite follow your explanation for it, so I'm not able to look past the concerns. arcticocean ■ 21:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Cmacauley

• Cmacauley (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Cmacauley has been an editor since 2007, meets all the required criteria, and would likely benefit from having the AP right granted. This editor currently has 59 live articles and has only had one article deleted. They have consistently produced well-referenced, high-quality articles, with the majority receiving B-class ratings. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done. One adverse consideration was this warning for violation of copyright. I'm prepared to look past it: the warning was issued in 2019 and nothing recurred while the user has been highly active since then. arcticocean ■ 21:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Anon423

• Anon423 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I've been around for some time, am quite familiar with tough conversations at the Teahouse or IRC (though I've sadly been inactive at the latter for a while) with new editors excitedly pushing their (often promotional) new articles, and do occasionally write new articles, 53 so far. I might as well not clutter the new pages queue. — Anon423 (talk) 01:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done arcticocean ■ 21:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User:SiniyaEdita

• SiniyaEdita (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Has created 166 articles, with all of them created over the last year or so are still live. As part of NPP, I reviewed Titus Joseph Mdoe and found that SiniyaEdita had created the page without the intervention from others, and I didn't think that it needed further improvement. Other articles they created are of a similar standard. Klbrain (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I came here to echo this request. I've reviewed several of SiniyaEdita's articles and they are all of a high standard. They also expand our quality coverage of Africa. Worth noting, the user's prior account (Fsmatovu) had autopatrolled status. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ojsyork

• Ojsyork (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm concerned that many of the articles on lifeboat stations don't meet GNG. After looking at a random sampling of them, most of them cite the Lifeboat Enthusiasts Society (of which Martin states they are a member of on their talk page), which appears to be an WP:SPS, and The Lifeboat, a publication of the RNLI, which is not an independent source. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Voorts I would have thought the same thing when I first encountered these articles, but there are several independent published sources on these lifesaving stations. Whenever I've done a BEFORE search on one, I always find GNG-qualifying sourcing. This came up in an AfD for one of Ojsyork's creations last year (Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bamburgh Castle Lifeboat Station), which resulted in a "keep". Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Needforname

• Needforname (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Misplaced Pages. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed.

Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required.

Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ahola .O

• Ahola .O (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Misplaced Pages and believe that my experience and adherence to Misplaced Pages's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Misplaced Pages's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Misplaced Pages more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)

(Non-administrator comment) You are currently not adding to the "workload of new page patrollers", in fact, your creations need to be watched closely. Not when I specifically told you here that the pieces you presented to inquire about Bobo Ajudua are thrash and nonsensical and told you to focus elsewhere instead of on an article that has been deleted several times. Yet, you went ahead to create it, and now, it has been deleted again? via AfD. And this? Your creations need to be watched and that is what the NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User:SDGB1217

• SDGB1217 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights

AutoWikiBrowser

User:ArkHyena

• ArkHyena (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: copyediting, particularly regarding MOS:NUM guidelines. ArkHyena (it/its) 20:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done. arcticocean ■ 09:06, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Harrz

• Harrz (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: mostly editing redirects so that they are tagged with the correct rcats harrz 15:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Confirmed

User:Unblock-un on hold

• Unblock-un on hold (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting confirmed rights Unblock-un on hold (talk) 20:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I assume this is based on this being a doppelganger, even though it's name has no relation to the name of your other claimed account? In order to establish that both accounts are controlled by the same person, please make a post here with the original account confirming the connection. Beeblebrox 23:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I didn't know which template to use instead of {{doppelganger}‍} but i changed it now Qrstw (talk) 17:39, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done – You are now confirmed. I've temporarily added the confirmed permisssion for one month, which should be sufficient for it to become autoconfirmed. Beeblebrox 21:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Dagoofybloke

• Dagoofybloke (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting confirmed rights:

Extended confirmed

User:Boutboul

• Boutboul (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for Request: I am requesting reinstatement of Extended Confirmed Rights after their removal by User:ScottishFinnishRadish for concerns related to "gaming EC through adding a machine translation of Fondation Maeght and Rueil-Malmaison in many small edits without attribution." He asked me to "make at least a few hundred edits" to regain it. Since the removal, I have added attribution to the concerned articles. I have made over 600 referenced contributions, focusing on adding reliable sources to improve verifiability, expanding content in alignment with Misplaced Pages’s standards, and enhancing article quality. I believe my recent contributions demonstrate constructive and policy-compliant editing.

Examples of Recent Contributions: Foucault pendulum, Water metering, Smart meter, and Gas meter. My recent edits also contributed significantly to upgrading the article History of the Jews in Tunisia from "Start-Class" to "B-Class." Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days () and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days (). — MusikBot 12:30, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Boutboul, are you using AI (such as ChatGPT or similar tools) to write your talk page messages and permission requests? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi @ToBeFree,

I use ChatGPT from time to time to translate sentences or correct English syntax, as English is not my mother tongue. I also used an LLM to translate French Wikicode into English Wikicode; it’s much faster than doing it manually.

Have you had the opportunity to check some of my edits? They are far from perfect, but I really try to follow Misplaced Pages standards (Verifiability, No Original Research, Follow Style Guidelines, etc.). I’m genuinely puzzled—I don’t understand why they are not considered valuable enough to regain my extended confirmed rights. I’ve been a Misplaced Pages member since 2006, with more than 900 edits in English and over 1,500 edits in total.

Thanks for your time and interest. Michael Boutboul (talk) 10:08, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

From their last post to their talk, @Boutboul seems interested in CT areas. I have concerns about the EC request given other issues raised on their Talk. Courtesy ping @ScottishFinnishRadish who removed initially. Star Mississippi 17:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

They're also continuing to translate from French Misplaced Pages without proper attribution, e.g. here. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

I properly attributed the translation by adding the template to the main page. However, a bot moved it to the talk page. I even explained this in a discussion topic on the talk page. Translation is not prohibited; in fact, it is encouraged by Misplaced Pages. Michael Boutboul (talk) 20:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

(b) Place the {{Translated page}} template on the target article's talk page, for example: emphasis mine. Nor did you attribute it in the edit summary as required: Add a statement to the edit summary of the target article of your translation providing translation attribution to the authors of the source article, including an interlanguage link to the source (translated-from) article. Example: This continued misunderstanding plus the LLM usage does not inspire confidence that they're ready to have E/C restored. They're welcome to edit in other areas but I explicitly do not think they're ready for CTs. Star Mississippi 20:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Firstly, I am not sure why you are using the plural for me. I am the only one making all the edits, and my pronoun is 'he'.

Secondly, I have attributed the text to a French translation in several edit summaries, for example, here and here. I may have forgotten some instances. However, if I am not mistaken, there is no rule stating that an editor must make no mistakes when editing to regain Extended Confirmed Rights. Furthermore, the quality of the translation is sufficient, as other editors appreciated it and upgraded the article from Start-Class to B-Class.

In addition, using an LLM for translation, syntax correction, or any other purpose is not forbidden.

It therefore seems that a decision not to reassign the Extended Confirmed rights would be arbitrary. Michael Boutboul (talk) 10:24, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Using third-person gender-neutral pronouns is pretty common and normal online. I have a question for you Michael out of interest. If you acquire the EC privilege, will you use it to advocate on behalf of any of the parties to the Arab-Israeli conflict, thus violating WP:NOTADVOCATE and the part of the Wikimedia Universal Code of Conduct that prohibits "Systematically manipulating content to favour specific interpretations of facts or points of view"? The reason I ask is that using extended confirmed privileges that way is puzzlingly common in the WP:PIA topic area, and I wondered whether you have considered these constraints. Sean.hoyland (talk) 10:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

@Sean.hoyland, Thank you for your constructive message. I believe that we all interact, on all sorts of topics, with our biases; we all have biases. I also believe that the beauty of Misplaced Pages lies in collectively building reliable content, based on discussions grounded in valid sources, despite everyone's individual biases. This is the mindset in which I wish to use my Extended Confirmed Rights. Michael Boutboul (talk) 11:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Is there something preventing you from simply stating that you will not (consciously anyway) advocate on behalf of any of the parties to the Arab-Israeli conflict? Is it an unrealistic expectation given the nature of the topic area? That is what I would have done by the way, provided assurance that I'm not a potential disruption vector in a contentious topic area. And then try to make a case for restoration of EC rights on that basis. Of course, if you did that, you would probably the first editor in Misplaced Pages's history to do so. Feel free to ignore my questions by the way. I'm just interested in things that might help to depolarize the topic area, like explicit commitments to not advocate on behalf of parties to the conflict (although I'm aware that the adversarial nature of the topic area might, under certain circumstances, help to increase the quality of content). Sean.hoyland (talk) 11:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Like any contributor on Misplaced Pages, I respect the platform's core principles, rules, and best practices to the best of my knowledge. Specifically, I strive to avoid advocating for any side and ensure that both my contributions and those of others align with the principle of neutrality of point of view (NPOV).

Since you raise the topic, I believe the best way to depolarize a contentious area is to acknowledge that every party involved inherently has its own biases.

Anyway, your concern is far from that of ScottishFinnishRadish and Star Mississippi. Michael Boutboul (talk) 18:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi, have you reviewed my edits? Could you please clearly explain your concerns? No one has provided a clear explanation for refusing to reassess my extended confirmed rights. Additionally, @ScottishFinnishRadish made an incorrect statement regarding proper attribution for translations. Michael Boutboul (talk) 20:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

@Arcticocean, First, I must thank you for the time you dedicated to responding and for your decision, even though I am, of course, in profound disagreement. I did not split my contributions to inflate my edit count! I have over 1,100 edits with an average size of 360 bytes, and as you have honestly noted, they are substantial, and I would add qualitative, even if far from perfect. On top of this accusation of 'gaming the rule,' I realize that I am also being accused of sockpuppeting. Something is definitely not right on en.wp. Michael Boutboul (talk) 11:04, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Scratchinghead

• Scratchinghead (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

@OhNoItsJamie removed my access to EC because i made a quite a few test edits and said if i made 100 constructive edits, i would gain it back, and so im asking for it, if not its fine i guess SCR@TCH!NGH3@D (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days (). — MusikBot 10:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

I've also translated 4 articles since then; with attribution in the talk page, and on my userpage, if not in the edit summary ☢️SCR@TCH!NGH3@D (talk) 05:58, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done arcticocean ■ 10:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Zabezt

• Zabezt (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Hello! A few weeks ago my extended-confirmed protection was removed for breaking WP:PGAME, I sincerely apologize for this, I was impatient and I had no knowledge of the rules existence at the time. Out of the 600 edits I’ve done so far, only ~50-80 of them are dummy edits, which I’ve done on my sandbox. Zabezt (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days (). — MusikBot 02:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

 Question: @JJMC89: Since your removal of the perm, the applicant has made over 100 edits, which outnumbers the edits that had been made to their sandbox. Do you have any objection to the perm being granted? arcticocean ■ 22:11, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

No — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 19:40, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User:54rt678

• 54rt678 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

BusterD said that I could get AC if I make at least 250 more constructive edits and that means a total of 750 edits. I have done more than that and I have intentions of constructively contributing to Misplaced Pages if I get extended confirmed access. Contact BusterD for more info 54rt678 (talk) 20:40, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days (). — MusikBot 20:40, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Non-admin comment: User came to IRC live help asking how long it will take this request reviewed, and stated:

I rushed 500. so then I did the required 250 more. And then I did 50 more than I had to to request EC before requesting EC. Potentially gaming system to get EC again, and have been camping out on recent changes to get the required number of edits. qcne (talk) 21:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Comment: I was the admin responsible for revoking (though another admin's demonstration to me) the user's EC permissions after I saw clear WP:PGAME for making 259 null edits on their User:54rt678/sandbox. (This was first time I revoked anyone's permissions; first time I ever cited PGAME.) These two threads (1, 2) on their talk say plenty. I'm happy the user is seen camping out on recent changes. This is IMHO a productive way to get the edits (and earn my respect back). If they'd done that the first time, they'd be under no scrutiny and more deeply into contentious topic userpage warnings by now. I made them no promises about their regaining EC permissions, but did give them caution and advice, such as it was. I'm still not sure the user understands why we're all here. I'm choosing not to grant these permissions myself at this time, but am watching the user's contributions. I am delighted the user has reacted to my cautions and responded to my conditions, such as they were. I get the impression this is a very young contributor. Mentoring might be an option. BusterD (talk) 22:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

I should assess myself as neutral. I'll let somebody uninvolved decide. I want 54rt678 to know they will be held accountable by the community for their actions, not just by me. BusterD (talk) 22:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done - Inexperience and was very recently gaming the system. arcticocean ■ 22:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

File mover

New page reviewer

User:QEnigma

• QEnigma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Hello, I would like to apply for New page reviewer rights. I am actively involved in reviewing Recent changes and Pending changes. I have also been reviewing Articles for creation since December 2024. Additionally, I have participated in Articles for deletion discussions. My primary areas of interest include politics, politicians, history, sports and topics related to Sri Lanka. I always strive to explain to editors the reasons for reverting their edits or declining their submissions when addressing their queries. I have also contributed by creating articles in the mainspace and participating in the NPPS programme to enhance my knowledge. Thank you. QEnigma talk 19:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Anuwrites

• Anuwrites (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

During my one-month trial as a NPR, I reviewed dozens of pages, nominated several for deletion or sending some to draftspace and edited/improved some pages. While I made some mistakes, such as accepting (good) page(s) created by socks that were later deleted, I intend to continue contributing responsibly by carefully reviewing pages, adhering to guidelines. I request renewal of the rights to continue supporting the project effectively. ANU 04:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 12:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User:AndreJustAndre

• AndreJustAndre (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Page mover

User:CommunityNotesContributor

• CommunityNotesContributor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Leaning towards no, mainly on account of a lack of demonstrated need, but willing to be overruled or persuaded otherwise. Primefac (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

As an example; I'd be able to close this RM if there is no consensus, as I did the previous that lacked consensus, but I wouldn't be able to if there was consensus. The one I closed had sat in the backlog for almost two months. CNC (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Intrisit

• Intrisit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ali Beary

• Ali Beary (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I'm requesting page mover rights because I want to have the ability, which would help in vandalism patrols and other things. Currently, someone moved a page for basically no reason and I'm trying to move it back, otherwise the page will have no former revision history. Thanks! Ali Beary _{(talk2me!) (stalk me?!)} 13:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 411 total edits. — MusikBot 14:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer

User:Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320

• Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

As I also do recent changes patrolling, having this permission will extemeley help me with combatting vandals, as edits requesting review can be viewed on the Recent Changes page, which will help me.

Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 23:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ampil

• Ampil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Note: The bot becoming silly, and marking as already done.

Hello I'm Ampil. The right set to expire 7 days. I've received a award. and I'm a AfC reviewer. ~🌀 Ampil 04:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

{{already done}} (automated response): This user already has the "reviewer" user right. — MusikBot 05:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ampil I know you noted in your original post, but just in case: this is not already done! Ampil is asking for the permission, which they currently hold, to not expire. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 20:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Zanahary, Thanks. I've removing the pin message. Because the bot had not been becoming silly. My PCR right makes without expiry. ~🌀 Ampil 11:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User:BryceM2001

• BryceM2001 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ali Beary

• Ali Beary (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary _{(talk2me!) (stalk me?!)} 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

User:TypeInfo

• TypeInfo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Hello, I've been active in the Misplaced Pages community adding new content and creating articles, but especially fighting vandalism. I have also gained experience in reviewing by looking and reviewing semi-protected and protected pages edit requests. I am now looking for a new challenge, and I think I could help by putting forth my skills for the pending changes reviewer role! Thanks for the consideration.TYPEINFO (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User:TrueMoriarty

• TrueMoriarty (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Misplaced Pages. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Sophisticatedevening

• Sophisticatedevening (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Rollback

User:Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320

• Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

I have been patrolling the recent changes page for a long time now, and it's pretty much the only thing I do on here (other then occasional copyediting.) When I learned about rollback and its benefits, I thought that could be a huge help for me and patrolling against vandalism. I love patrolling, and this will make my life so much easier.

Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 20:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320, is there something in the Simple Misplaced Pages you may like to reconsider? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

What do you mean? ive only done 2 edits to the simple wikipedia

1 to the ultrakill page

2 to my user page Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 01:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

oh wait i know what you mean. ill change that. @ToBeFree Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 01:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Done, i just copy n' pasted my userpage from the main wikipedia over to the simple. @ToBeFreeTenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 15:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

If you copy it to your userpage on meta.wikimedia.org, it will be a global user page for all wikis where you don't yet have a specific userpage. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320, I'll decline this request for now. I might grant the pending changes reviewer permission although your request for it is based on a desire for "combatting vandals" rather than accepting non-vandalism, which is what the permission primarily allows you to do. Your Simple English Misplaced Pages userpage, for the record, had only the following content: penis. The concerns voiced by others on your user talk page seem to confirm my original impression of a lack of experience (and perhaps simply maturity). When you patrol recent changes and inform users about the problems with their edits, the impression you make on the newcomers will often be their primary impression from Misplaced Pages (or its moderation, its perceived representatives, its community) as a whole. It may help to imagine Misplaced Pages as a workplace where you interact with colleagues, everyone is paid to behave professionally and to improve the encyclopedia while sitting in an office with a cup of coffee on the desk. Imagine there's a meeting on, let's say 21 February 2025, in this room here, where you apply for the position as "rollbacker" in your company. In your application, you could provide a few examples for obvious, clear vandalism that you reverted, and that you could have reverted more efficiently if you had had access to a rollback link. Perhaps you could also provide a few counterexamples where you undid someone's good-faith contributions and explained the problem to the user, which is a situation where using rollback wouldn't have been an option, and you are aware of this. Feel free to notify me about the request and I'll probably grant it. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done yet ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:24, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User:NotQualified

• NotQualified (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Reason for requesting rollback rights

Hello! I routinely go to the Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_page_protection when I spot vandalism. I believe this would make the process of resolving issues faster. If you need links to my requests, I can provide them! If there is more things I could do, please tell me. NotQualified (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

NotQualified, I think this is too early. If you can provide 10 diff links to edits made by you that would have benefited from the rollback permission, I'll reconsider. Else, please actively patrol Special:RecentChanges for at least a month, sending warning messages to users whose edits you have reverted, and reporting users at WP:AIV who ignore the warnings. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:26, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Jingiby

• Jingiby (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Hello everyone. I would like to request rollback rights here. I have a long and controversial history on the English Misplaced Pages but hope that especially in recent years, I have proved as to other editors, as well to the administrators, a positive change in my editorial behavior. I myself, don't forgive and don't forget my mistakes, but believe that with my experience and knowledge on the Macedonian issue, I will be useful in the fight against vandalism in this complicated question. Even though I'm worried, I remember Matthew 7:7-8: “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened." Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 09:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello Jingiby. You had rollback declined a few years ago (June 20, 2018), per this link. At that time, reviewers mentioned your prior blocks on enwiki and an indef block on the Macedonian Misplaced Pages. The admin who declined your rollback was User:Swarm. Have there been any new developments since 2018 that you would like to bring to our attention here? EdJohnston (talk) 23:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

I haven't been blocked on the Macedonian Misplaced Pages for years, but in general, the attitude towards Bulgarian editors on historical topics there is a quite special. Jingiby (talk) 06:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

By the way, during the last 15 years I am busy to deal with such IPs' activity. Jingiby (talk) 12:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Cyberdog958

• Cyberdog958 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)

Template editor

• Administrators
  • Main
  • Incidents
• Bots
• Bureaucrats
• Centralized discussion
• Closure requests
• Education
• Interface admins
• Main Page errors
• Open proxies
• VRT
• Oversight
• User permissions

• Biographies of living persons
• Copyrights
  • Questions on media
  • Problems
• Dispute resolution
• External links
• Fringe theories
• Neutral point of view
• Original research
• Pending changes
• Reliable sources
• Resource requests
• Scalable vector graphics
• Spam
  • Blacklist
  • Whitelist
• Style
• Titleblacklist
• Translation

• History merges
• Mergers
• Splits
• Moves
• Protection
• Importation
• XfD
  • Articles
  • Redirects
  • Categories
  • Templates
  • Files
  • Miscellany
• Undeletion

• Conflict of interest
• Contributor copyright
• Edit warring and 3RR
• Sanctions
  • Personal restrictions
  • General sanctions
  • Contentious topics
• Sockpuppets
• Usernames (Requests for comment)
• Vandalism

• Arbitration
  • Committee noticeboard
  • Requests
  • Enforcement
• Edit filters
  • Requested
  • False positives
• Questions
  • Help desk
  • Teahouse
  • Reference desk
  • New articles
• Requests for comment
• Village pump
  • Policy
  • Technical
  • Proposals
  • Idea lab
  • WMF
  • Miscellaneous
• WikiProject proposals
• Discussions for discussion

General cleanup

Reference problems

Image cleanup problems

Other problems