Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/A Kiwi - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for checkuser | Case

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zeraeph (talk | contribs) at 12:40, 31 August 2006 (→Related Discussions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:40, 31 August 2006 by Zeraeph (talk | contribs) (→Related Discussions)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
A static IP address does not always denote location, it can be proxied. Anyone with a landline can dial in. A checkuser may prove nothing, one way or the other (nothing can be proven here about meatpuppetry, which is also a very real option). But, sooner or later, everybody makes a mistake. Maybe there is already a mistake to be caught, and if there is, that will resolve everything. --Zeraeph 06:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


One needs to understand the current state of internet connectiveness. Cable is a dedicated access purchased through a local provider and is actually a cable that is wired into the home. There is no "calling in". And broadband is a dedicated specialized data line wired into the home via the normal phone outlets. There is no "calling in". Only dial-up can be accessed by a phone call from a remote location since dial-up ISP access is, naturally enough, via a phone call into the mainframe computer that routes the computer onto the internet.
Keyne's access is specific to a particular company in Chicago, not a residential connection. This may reflect her more sporadic and limited editing. Sandy's could conceivably be a residential connection since she spends a great number of hours daily editing.
As to using proxies, only long-term subscribing to a proxy service would allow an individual to have possession of a specific IP address, and in no case would the proxy be specifically identified as belonging to an actual physical business not involved in internet access, nor to an independent provider of regular subscription service. The use of subscription proxy services are mandatory for government employees in sensitive jobs who wish to use their work computer for personal time on the internet. A search will provide with specific disclosure that the address is that of a subscription proxy provider.
Most proxy services online (including the free ones) use a wide variety of addresses that will vary from one time to another. Certain services are set to continually switch from one address to another during any particular session. They are the preferred domain of hackers not talented enough to use the computers of those who are ignorant of such activity, only recognizing that their connection speed diminishes and their RAM eaten up.
To imagine that an extremely busy editor would create a sock who works diligently and responsibly over months and months with no conceivable purpose than to someday defend the first from a spurious attack -- when the same proposed sock has failed to show up and "protect" the first from the many many other editors who regularly also take offense. What makes you, as a person, so uniquely special and formidable that Sandy would uncharacteristically disappear from view and have the other person fight her battles for her?
No, the only parallel between these two individuals was their collaboration on one topic, Asperger Syndrome, where you cast aspersions on Sandy, who eventually stopped giving you attention.
On Asperger-Talk and in two previous Cabals created by Sandy), you have been repeatedly invited to give details to substantiate your stated beliefs and then try to work out the differences - which is SOP on Talk pages. Each and every time, you state that the person asking for that substantiation as manipulative and controlling in their offering to work things out and asking you to point out exactly what is behind your blanket assertions. You have now devolved to asserting that those editors who are trying to iron out the issues are not worthy of your engagement as they are obvious socks - an ad hominen attack.
Even though you have no proof that Keyne is (or is not) a friend of Sandy's (I am not, for instance), it is still upright thing to engage in arbitration rather than showing disdain at what you declare to be their innate unworthiness of your time and attention.
It behooves no one for open conflict between administrators to remain unresolved. Administrators should be an example to the run of the mill editos under you, showing how responsible adults handle their emotions. ::--I am Kiwi 10:29, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
The above superfluous rationale with it's attempts to browbeat me with numerous distortions of personal and general fact (I don't think this is the place to detail them) should be, in itself, evidence of why I am requesting a checkuser.--Zeraeph 10:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Related Discussions