Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JDC808 (talk | contribs) at 22:27, 6 September 2016 (→User-reported). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• WP:AIV

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
   • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.

This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.

This page was last updated at 12:50 on 4 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Reports

Bot-reported

• Nalinsharma1980 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

• Nadiacgvieira (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Promotional edits only, with copyright violations. 2601:188:1:AEA0:BC62:BFD6:7849:F056 (talk) 17:05, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

• Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 18:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

• Philosophical Views (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Olivera Z. Mijuskovic: account is being used only for promotional purposes. Sole goal is to promote this non-notable philosophy writer. Doesn't seem to have any valid evidence that this person is notable and has repeatedly posted the article without any convincing citations. Blythwood (talk) 17:06, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
• Athar Hussain (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Promotional only. Here to write a non notable autobiography. 2601:188:1:AEA0:BC62:BFD6:7849:F056 (talk) 21:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
• KamiaMulhotra1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Kamia Mulhotra: vandalism after final warning; account is being used only for promotional purposes. Repeated removal of speedy tags on self promoting article. A User (contribs) 21:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
• 203.121.73.76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) keeps putting tamil language over unrelated malaysian (and other) pages and setting their native languages to tamil. RandomPerson81 (talk) 21:28, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
• 184.156.164.239 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On User:Zackmann08/userboxes (diff):. Repeated vandalism of user page. Zackmann08 (/_{What I been doing}) 21:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
• JDC808 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) User had committed five documented cases of vandalism in the last hour. (Edits: 1, , , 4, 5) he was warned here: (view edit summary) and has since committed five more acts of vandalism here: (Edits: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) User was told numerous times that the discussion he continuously referenced was for a page title and not its contents. User continuously ignored this and made edits at his own discretion. Weweremarshall (talk) 22:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
  • NOTE: Since this report was filed, the same user has since violated the 3RR on page WWE SmackDown Tag Team Championship as he's made four reverts in the last 24 hours. (Edits: , , , ) Unfortunately, now a ban isn't up for discussion, only the length of said ban. Weweremarshall (talk) 22:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
    • @Weweremarshall: edit warring should be reported at WP:AN3. clpo13_(talk) 22:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
      • Comment: Wewermarshall has been disrupting the page by continuously removing content when a discussion on said matter is currently in place. He is claiming I have vandalized, but it appears that this user does not know what vandalism means, and has in fact himself teetered into the waters of committing vandalism by continuously reverting the page to his preferred version before a consensus has been met. I am not the only editor who has pointed the discussion out to him. Yes, I did revert him multiple times, but only to put the articles back at the version of pre-consensus. Here are the article histories for the articles in question: 1, 2, 3, and 4. Also, I had left a comment on his talk page, but he just brushed it off and ignored it. --JDC808 ♫ 22:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
        • Comment: As the user literally just proved for me, he continues to make edits without reading comments from other editors. On this exact page he claims "a discussion on the matter is currently in place", I pointed out in this exact thread that the discussion was only for the page title and not its contents, he ignored it on this page, he ignored it in the edit summary. Additionally placed his comment out of chronological order so it could be read ahead of other comments. Weweremarshall (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
          •  Comment: Please stop assuming things. The discussions do in fact apply to the whole articles. My comment was placed "out of chronological order" as you've stated because it was a direct reply to the report, not the two replies following it (those comments were also saying where this report should have been made, and were not commenting on the contents of the report itself). Sufficient information has been supplied to the administrators. --JDC808 ♫ 22:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
• Weweremarshall (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) in trying to stop the vandalism conducted by the user reported, I believe I myself have committed vandalism because of the amount of times I had to undo his vandalism. Though I didn't violate 3RR on a specific page, I did across multiple pages. I don't know if this counts but felt it necessary to submit myself for review. Weweremarshall (talk) 22:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

• This is a case for WP:ANI or WP:AN3, this noticeboard is only for obvious vandalism.LM2000 (talk) 22:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages vandalism
• Administrative backlog