This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.143.175.215 (talk) at 21:48, 9 September 2006 (→Atheist Hindus). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:48, 9 September 2006 by 86.143.175.215 (talk) (→Atheist Hindus)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Archives |
|---|
--nids 23:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC) nidhish
Welcome!
- user talk:Nidhishsinghal/Archive 1: July 2006 – August 2006
- user talk:Nidhishsinghal/Archive 2: September 2006 - Dec 2006
To delete talk:nidhishsinghal/archive 1
Basics!
HI... i'm temuzion and i wanna know one thing...how can i send mail through wikipedia and if any one sent me any mail would it be saved ? Is there chatting in wikipedia? How can i check my previous mails? 202.141.98.204 12:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- well, first i suggest you sign up on wikipedia, it will be better for you. For emailing, you will see a link e-mail this user just below search field on the left side of any user page. If the user has email enabled, he will recieve the email.nids(♂) 12:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Welcome,_newcomers may also be helpful to you.nids(♂) 12:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Ashfaqulla Khan
Notable patriot Ashfaqulla Khan is up for AfD.Bakaman Bakatalk 22:09, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:YV_VSM_23.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:YV_VSM_23.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 09:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Kurukshetra War
This article certainly needs expansion, however another user had spent the time to include details of each day in the main article. I moved these to separate sub articles. It was not for me to judge whether these were needed or not. The article is unfinished as I had keft it on day 12, but I have seen no effort from any other editor to complete it. - Parthi 20:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Category:Hindu politicians
Up for deletion review. There is a cat for Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, anglican etc. politicians so I don't see why there isn't a Hindu cat.Bakaman Bakatalk 16:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Make a comment on deletion review or the cfd.Bakaman Bakatalk 16:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- CfD functions just like an Afd. The CfD is here.Bakaman Bakatalk 16:33, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Hindi Wiki
Namaskar nids! One of the reasons why Indian language Wikipedias are so bad is because of people having trouble to write in Indic scripts. One solution which User:Bhadani has also embraced is that you can write Hindi articles in Roman letters on a subpage of your userpage. eg. Create User:nids/romanhindi on Hindi Wiki and you can start writing articles with English letters. I or someone else, can then convert it into a proper article in Devanagari. Btw, I also work on Sanskrit Misplaced Pages, which is in even worse shape. It is a shame that such beautiful languages aren't receiving any attention. Gizza 02:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Sanskrit Wiki
I don't do anything substantial on Sanskrit Misplaced Pages. I just add one sentence to simple articles such as "Nagpura bharata deshe eka nagaram asti!" I don't anything in detail. I know that by the way google works however, that if I keep on creating small stubs with wikilinks, those pages will come higher on a google search. I hope that more people will start contributing this way. There is only one guy there currently who is well educated in Sanskrit. His name is Nityagopal Katare. Gizza 09:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
Certain users think Kancha Ilaiah can be quoted as an authority on Hinduism here: .Bakaman Bakatalk
Subhash Bose's block
I blocked Subhash Bose was revert-warring on Atal Behari Vajpayee. Edit-warring and violation of 3RR is considered disruptive and the content is irrelevant to the enforcement of 3RR, since even if the person reverting is is putting it to the correct version, they should use discussion rather than edit warring. That's what the block is for, not for incorrect content. The block was also based on Subhash Bose's previous record which shows that he has not reformed despite being warned and blocked several times. I hope that clears it up. --Srikeit 20:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Are You Serious?
You actually want people to vandalise your userpage?
WereWolf 16:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
help me
I have read all the policies of wikipedia, but it is still not clear to me that whether 3RR is an electric fence or does it not apply in cases of clear vandalism. I always follow 1RR rule, except in exceptional cases. Just as an example, i would like to know whether this qualifies as an revert. There was no case for content dispute, as the whole section was blanked without reason. Just after i reverted the blanking of a section, a user blanked it again. I could not revert it again as i didnt knew whether the revert rule will apply here or not.nids(♂) 17:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
- WP:3RR doesn't apply to simple vandalism, but as you observe determining if something is vandalism or not can be tricky. In that case the initial removal does include an edit summary indicating that they are removing it because there is already a substantial article on the topic. This is of course self evident as the section includes a link to that main article, which they are also removing, so it then looks like an issue of NPOV. The best thing to do in that sort of case is to restore and try and get the editor in question to understand that such a setup is a normal part of wikipedia articles. Given the high profile nature of that article I'm sure you won't be alone in reverting such edits, so you should really need to worry about getting to 3 reverts. If the person doing the removal does, you can of course report them or you can always ask for temporary page protection at WP:RFPP --pgk 17:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
For protecting the citation on Indian nationalism, those guys keep removing sourced statements though, also if they can't they just rephrase it so it loses effect. anywas. Freedom skies 19:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Check this site out
This has some results of DNA studies of the Negroid tribes in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. . One part reads :- "The questions remain, how then these so called Andamanese reached Andamans? And are there any tribes in Indian mainland which show resemblance with Andamanese and therefore shed light on the root of migration? To answer these questions, we also studied tribal population of the West coast of India. There are indeed tribes in Gujarat and Kerala which show close affinities to Andamanese Negrito tribes, both in their mtDNA haplotypes and Y-DNA halotypes (YAP+). These tribes appear to be older than the Andamanese. We have, therefore, undertaken DNA analysis of all the primitive tribes of India in collaboration with the Anthropological Survey of India (ASI). These studies may throw some light on the mystery of our own origins. In contrast to Andamanese, the Nicobarese have genetic affinities to groups widely distributed today throughout Asia; thus, the Nicobarese should presumably descend from Neolithic Agriculturists. " Haphar 22:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
vegetarianism
no not true about vegetarianism... only strict buddhists and it depends on the sect. Kennethtennyson
Great work
First on protecting the Cohen citation, then the Govt of Pak thing and now more in Indian nationalism.
Y'know, people have been providing citations and still either getting their stuff removed or getting the language in the article watered down.
Thanks for vigilantly keeping that from happening. Freedom skies 14:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Since I'll be busy keeping an eye on my Indian martial arts article, you should try this book, by Stanley Wolpert himself, a citation from here should be an argument ender in any event.
- Freedom skies 20:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Re: Nobel
According to Nobel_laureates_by_country
- The list shows nationalities of the laureates, as stated at the official website of the Nobel Prize. Some laureates are listed under more than one country: for instance, if their country of birth and/or nationality differs from their country of residence. In these cases, a star (*) appears next to their name when it is listed under their birth country, and their country of birth appears in italics next to their name in all other lists
Amartya Sen, Subramanyan Chandrashekhar, and CV Raman were both born in India (or British India). Naipaul is different. You CAN say he is a person of Indian descent, but the list in question is about country, not heritage. According to , Naipaul was born in Trinidad. His ancestors came from India. If you want to consider him under India entry in the list, you have to add every American scientist under England, Scotland, Ireland, Germany or whatever country their ancestors came from. So, adding Naipaul under Nobel_laureates_by_country#India is incorrect. I hope you understand my logic. Thanks. --Ragib 21:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Yes, you are correct that the star * doesn't belong in Tagore's entry there. --Ragib 22:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)\
- Ha ha, thanks for noticing the ambiguity of the sentence ... read it as "You are correct in saying that". :). Thanks. --Ragib 22:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
RfC on Lalu Prasad Yadav
- I have files an RfC regarding Holywarriors edits to Lalu Prasad Yadav here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Politics
- I am told that at least two users need to try to negotiate with holywarrior within 48 hours
(this) before it will be endorsed. I have detailed the issue and approach you for perspective regarding this matter. If you think you'd like to participate then please do drop by. Thanks.Hkelkar 00:55, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Re: Atheism in Hinduism
Hi... I've added extensive comments to the Atheism in Hinduism deletion page and article. I believe, like you, it would be a travesty, if that article were deleted. Take care and rock on.
- Oh and by the way re: Byomkesh and Rajit/Rajat Kapoor, I wasn't ever mad. Check the talk page for Byomkesh Bakshi. Thanks again. --Antorjal 05:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Atheist Hindus
Any problem with what Babub is suggesting?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aupmanyav (talk • contribs) .
I took issue with some of your edits of yours in the past, but by no means would I say that I "do not like you". I have no idea who you are, and I agree that there is no reason to delete the article on atheism in Hinduism. regards, dab (ᛏ) 10:43, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Please stop reverting
We are building a encyclopaedia. SO don't remove facts about Hindu fundamentalists like Bajrang Dal.