Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Capitals00 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Terabar (talk | contribs) at 00:15, 14 December 2016 (Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:15, 14 December 2016 by Terabar (talk | contribs) (Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Capitals00

Capitals00 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Capitals00/Archive.



13 December 2016

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets


User: D4iNa4 and User: Capitals00 are actually one person and is using his/her ids inappropriately from a long time. And they both were blocked previously for using multiple accounts. See here and here. Sockpuppet investigation was launched many times by different users time to time. User:Zanhe also reported the same thing few months ago but was later ignored. Here I would like to present the same edits used by these two ids pushing their propaganda.

Now he is again back reverting with using his two ids on List of converts to Islam from Hinduism

  • 1st revert by D4iNa4
  • 2nd revert by Capitals00

User: Zanhe also reported the same thing here but was later ignored. I am pasting Zanhe's report also for further ease in investigation.

These two ids have been using different ids inappropriately and were blocked previously. I further request you to look into this matter. Please ! Terabar (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

In November 2015, Mike V found these two accounts to be  Unlikely. With the lapse of time, I would go slightly further and say they are very  Unlikely. Closing with no action.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

User:Bbb23, thanks for your comment. But can't you see that these two accounts are supporting each other's edits and are acting like meatpuppets? Don't you think that they are connected offline? Terabar (talk) 19:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
User:Mike V, can you look into this matter again? Terabar (talk) 00:15, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Categories: