This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 05:03, 31 December 2016 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's Health/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:03, 31 December 2016 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's Health/Archive 1) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Women's Health Project‑class | |||||||
|
Women Project‑class | |||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Women's Health and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Women's health
Women's health has now been rated GA and could probably be tweaked to FA. I have provided this article in the hope that this can be considered a flagship article to unify the other pages on this project and a potential model to follow. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 17:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- The article is mentioned in the Did You Know? section of Misplaced Pages's home page today. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 14:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
Greetings WikiProject Women's Health Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Know much about the history of our understanding of the placenta?
Hi! I picked a women scientist at random off the women in science worklist and have started an article on Elizabeth M. Ramsey, who, with Martin Denner, greatly increased the understanding of the placental circulatory system. If someone here could better describe her work, it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Chris vLS (talk) 02:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
You have got to be kidding me - cardiac arrest in men vs women
FYI Talk:Cardiac_arrest#You_have_got_to_be_kidding_me_-_cardiac_arrest_in_men_vs_women. Ottawahitech (talk) 08:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)please ping me
January 2017 at Women in Red
| |
---|---|
Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 12:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Categories: