Misplaced Pages

Talk:Shakespeare authorship question/to do

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Shakespeare authorship question

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Barryispuzzled (talk | contribs) at 22:49, 15 September 2006 (task completed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:49, 15 September 2006 by Barryispuzzled (talk | contribs) (task completed)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
  1. Citations are needed for many of the claimed orthodox perspectives, many of which use weasel words such as 'the orthodox perspective is...'. Quotable sources include Sam Schoenbaum's Shakespeare's Lives and Shakespeare: A Documentary Life, Jonathan Bate's The Genius of Shakespeare, Park Honan's Shakespeare: a Life, and David Kathman's website.
  2. Citations are needed for many of the anti-Stratfordian arguments. Ideally, these citations should be to the 'classic' texts in the field, in order to avoid giving undue weight to not-yet established or minority anti-Stratfordian theories: this too would follow Misplaced Pages policy.
  3. In accordance with the previous point, all ideas that are only supported by references to self-published books or websites by non-experts in theatre history need to be weeded out (not because they're necessarily wrong, but because Misplaced Pages policy is to avoid citations to such texts).
  4. Many typical anti-Stratfordian arguments are still missing, e.g. the claim that Shakespeare was not eulogized when he died.