Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/2L programming language - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hahnchen (talk | contribs) at 17:05, 19 September 2006 ([]: d). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:05, 19 September 2006 by Hahnchen (talk | contribs) ([]: d)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

2L programming language

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.

Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:

--ais523 15:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - already merged whilst the concept of overloading by direction is interesting, it's technically nothing new, and not something that new works would be based upon. Lack of verification is an issue. LinaMishima 02:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep, already merged. Kappa 06:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect Already merged. --ais523 11:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment - What the fuck has it been merged to, can someone actually explain their votes? And if it is already merged, why then, is Kappa voting Speedy Keep? Has something been merged here? What is Ais523 suggesting we redirect to? - Hahnchen 17:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Anything of worth is covered in Brainfuck. No assertion of anything. Speedy Keep is the stupidest vote I've seen. - Hahnchen 17:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Categories: