Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by David Tornheim (talk | contribs) at 01:45, 7 April 2017 (Adding Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Yemen at the 2012 Summer Olympics. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Recent AfDs:    Today    Yesterday      December 24 (Tue)      December 23 (Mon)      December 22 (Sun)     More... Media   Organisations   Biography   Society   Web   Games   Science   Arts   Places   Indiscern.  Not-Sorted

Village pumps

policy

tech

proposals

idea lab

WMF

misc

• Voluntary RfAs after resignation
• Allowing page movers to enable two-factor authentication
• Rewriting the guideline Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers
• Should comments made using LLMs or chatbots be discounted or even removed?

• view
• edit
• history
• watch
• archive
• talk
• purge

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow keep, clearly meets the policy--Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Yemen at the 2012 Summer Olympics

Yemen at the 2012 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG requirement --David Tornheim (talk) 01:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

I wasn't familiar with WP:NOLYMPICS. I must scratch my head at that standard that every year a country participates in the Olympics constitutes a full article. With 196 countries and Olympics every 2-4 years, that is potentially a lot of articles about just the Olympics. --David Tornheim (talk) 19:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Keep Every other nation has a 'x at the y z Games' article. Sourcing is good enough and I'm not willing to set a precedent that sees other countries lose articles just because their athletes didn't medal. Nate • (chatter) 04:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:NOLYMPICS: "Nations participating at an individual Summer Olympic Games are considered notable" OZOO 06:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:NOLYMPICS and mandatory drugs test for the nom. Lugnuts 06:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:NOLYMPICS Nimrodbr (talk) 11:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per WP:NOLYMPICS, which clearly says these articles are notable. Let's stop wasting everybody's time and close this now. Smartyllama (talk) 13:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Premeditated Chaos under criterion G4. (non-admin closure). "Pepper" @ 20:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello Neighbor

• Articles for deletion/Hello Neighbor
• Articles for deletion/Hello Neighbor (2nd nomination)

Hello Neighbor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTGUIDE Lil Johnny (talk) 01:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete: Per being closed as delete in the last AfD. I tagged it for speedy deletion. SL93 (talk) 04:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz 02:07, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Emil Lemnaru

Emil Lemnaru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ex-mayor of a relatively small provincial city; scant coverage, and most of that routine; patently fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BASIC. - Biruitorul 01:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. Onești is not large or prominent enough to hand its mayors an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NPOL just for existing, but the referencing here (which consists of just one piece of reliable source coverage and one primary source report) is nowhere near enough to get him over WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 18:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. Not enough reliable independent sources to justify notability per WP:GNG. Tzsagan (talk) 10:24, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 07:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Financial Accessibility of National Parks in the United States

Financial Accessibility of National Parks in the United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Combination of POV pushing and an index of park fees (WP:NOTTRAVEL), neither of which belong on Misplaced Pages. (another student essay by the same group) – Train2104 (t • c) 01:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Delete or Userfy per nom. Topic itself may be suitable for inclusion, but the article's current form is not the way to do it. After reviewing the talk page, it would appear neither of the instructors raised concern over neutrality, but rather encouraged such POV; which is both disconcerting and deeply unfortunate. One may wish to keep an eye on other sandboxed/draft articles emanating from this Wiki Edu project as several waiting in the hopper are equally biased as this one up for discussion. -- dsprc  23:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Extremely selective merge to National Park Service. There are a couple of good references, and they could go to make up a paragraph in the main article. Otherwise delete as POV-pushing. StAnselm (talk) 20:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
• TNT This entire topic is WP:OR from nps.gov - the title "Financial Accessibility" is OR, article is full of unsourced POV like "Accessibility to national parks can decrease during this administration because President Trump has threatened to defund the National Parks Service. This would cause the National Parks to become more expensive to visit, through increase in entrance or yearly fees, or in some cases even shutting down National Parks. Our national parks are becoming increasingly vulnerable to destruction as climate change will negatively impact the ecosystems of many of our National Parks." Seraphim System 05:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Fields (progressive rock band). Kurykh (talk) 05:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Fields (Fields album)

Fields (Fields album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not demonstrate the notability of the "Fields" album. The album does not appear to meet the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Notability (music)#Recording. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Keep and merge to Fields (progressive rock band). The band was only together long enough to record one album, so a merge there seems the obvious outcome, however much coverage there is. --Michig (talk) 09:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton |  01:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Tom Kenyon (musician)

Tom Kenyon (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found no coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 02:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

• Comment – Here's a source that was in the article at the time it was nominated for deletion, from The Seattle Times. North America 02:41, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  • @Northamerica1000: That source actually establishes the notability of "Song of the New Earth", not the musician, per WP:NOTINHERITED. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Delete MUSICBIO, GNG, lack of RS. Shamanistic music in his psychotic healings? Get dat out of here! L3X1 (distant write) 23:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
• Delete doesn't pass our guidelines either as a musician or an author. Youtube and the like are absolutely NOT reliable sources. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Fleming Stadium. Rough consensus that this topic does not deserve an article. (non-admin closure) feminist 14:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

North Carolina Baseball Museum

North Carolina Baseball Museum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been speedied twice under A7 and G11, but has now been recreated for the second time. Of the 4 sources now provided in the article, only one could be considered significant independent coverage, and this is only from a local news organisation (not sufficient under WP:NCORP). Thoroughly unencyclopedic and not notable. Triptothecottage (talk) 00:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Triptothecottage (talk) 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Triptothecottage (talk) 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Triptothecottage (talk) 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• delete and salt clearly fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 12:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Keep I have seen articles about this museum from multiple sources through the years. With a little research, it should easily pass notability guidelines. Kinston eagle (talk) 13:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

WP:MUSTBESOURCES. LibStar (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Keep; following up Kinston eagle's comment, sources are apparent in searches, including and books like . Could also consider merging this with Fleming Stadium. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Per WP:CORPDEPTH, aren't most of these just "lists of similar organisations"? Triptothecottage (talk) 09:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

• Merge to Fleming Stadium article. I don't feel that the museum itself is particularly notable for it's own article but the content can be retained on the stadium article. Spanneraol (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Planernaya Railway Station

Planernaya Railway Station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no references. It appears to not meet the standards in Misplaced Pages:Notability (geographic features)#Buildings and objects. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Comment The relevant guideline here would be WP:RAILOUTCOMES, for "Existing heavy rail stations on a main system." IF it can be confirmed that this is what it is, it should be kept. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Keep pursuant to WP:RAILOUTCOMES. The article in English needs work but the Russian article (Планерная_(платформа)) confirms that it is a heavy rail passenger station on the Moscow - St. Petersburg main line. Fiachra10003 (talk) 02:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Yes, that does seem so. Keep, for reasons stated above. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per WP:RAILOUTCOMES and above. Nördic Nightfury 10:02, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Keep - It's a real mainline rail station. An article for such a station in the US or UK would never be considered for deletion. Might this be a case of systemic bias? --Oakshade (talk) 02:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
• Keep the article is in need of work but easily meets relevant notability criteria. SamsaK (talk) 16:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
• Keep Agree with WP:GEOBIAS concerns raised above. Railway stations confirmed to exist are notable per WP:RAILOUTCOMES. AusLondonder (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw 21:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Idris Abraham (wrestler)

Idris Abraham (wrestler) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG ThatGirlTayler (talk) 00:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:34, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - agree with nominator, does not meet GNG.  MPJ-DK  10:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. Also WP:TOOSOON. Nikki♥311 21:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton |  03:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Glen L. Roberts

Glen L. Roberts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article probably written by Roberts himself. It would need a major re-writing. WP:TNT is a better idea IMHO. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paraguay-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Strong delete This article is built around primary documents, not secondary documents showing notability as is required of encyclopedia articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw 21:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Sonya Strong

Sonya Strong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nikki♥311 00:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 00:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - agree with nominator, does not meet GNG.  MPJ-DK  10:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - with four sources (one of them being from social media), it clearly fails GNG. Nickag989 16:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.