This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EvergreenFir (talk | contribs) at 18:35, 11 April 2017 (→Suggestion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:35, 11 April 2017 by EvergreenFir (talk | contribs) (→Suggestion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) This user is NOT a humanThis is the combined talk page for ClueBot NG and ClueBot III. These users are automated computer programs and are not humans. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot – either a bot operator or another human will answer you. ClueBot III is currently not archiving some talk pages; this issue is being investigated. ClueBot NG Links!Report False Positives •The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
The current status of ClueBot III is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
Template:Archive box collapsible
| ClueBots | |
|---|---|
| ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script |  |
| ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
 | Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
Regarding Chitpavan edit
Dear sir , The edit which you reverted was not vandalism but correction on my part.The paricular article is very political and contains biased views about the community.The addition which I did is quoted from a scholar Ravinder kumar whose source can be found in the same article itself (no. 29 ). I request you to please restore the changes Abcscholar (talk) 07:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Abcscholar Please read the bright red notice at the top of the talk page--5 albert square (talk) 07:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
#Hamiltrash vandalism
There is a reasonably well-defined category of persistent vandalism going on, related to the musical Hamilton, mostly consisting of inserting quotes from the lyrics into related articles. Can the bot take a special pass to review and learn from manually-reverted vandalism, on a dataset consisting (for example) of the following pages?
- pages that link to Alexander Hamilton
- pages that link to Aaron Burr
That's broader than necessary, so please let me know if you'd want a narrower dataset of examples. Thanks! Lwarrenwiki (talk) 14:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
ClueBot report interface...
...is down. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- As are the IRC feeds. West.andrew.g (talk) 17:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- And oddly enough, CBNG itself is running. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- CB III (archiving), on the other hand, is down. ~ Rob13 12:20, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- And oddly enough, CBNG itself is running. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
IRC is still down. I will ping the operators. Thanks, West.andrew.g (talk) 13:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- After a couple day fix, IRC is down again. West.andrew.g (talk) 14:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
False positive
I cannot submit a false positive through the other link. It appears to be broken. This edit is clearly not vandalism. Anyone who can access the link please submit this. Revert ID: 2995778. Thank you! RoCo 01:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- 2996586 was also a false positive. Nate • (chatter) 15:50, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Also this: was a false positive
This is also a false positive 2996528 Koden02 (talk) 05:29, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Another false positive
I tried to report a false positive (revert ID 2999792) on behalf of a new user, but the link from User:ClueBot NG/FalsePositives delivered up a 404 error. Pinging User:Rich Smith and User:DamianZaremba. RivertorchWATER 12:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
A question.
It seems that Cluebot III and Cluebot NG are slowly falling into code-disrepair. As Misplaced Pages changes, so does vandalism. Meanwhile, Cluebot NG isn't detecting 40% (Roughly) of vandalism. Yes, Cluebot NG makes our lives easier, but i think it's time for a rewrite. Also, Cluebot III is just... Yeah. Maybe it's time to deactivate Cluebot III and create a new, fully updated version of it similar to how the original Cluebot got deactivated in favor of Cluebot NG. Terrariola (talk) 10:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Terrariola: ClueBot NG doesn't need a code rewrite, just needs to have its database of edits updated for recent vandalism trends. CBNG was designed to learn and adapt over time.
- As for CBIII... there's lowercase sigmabot III, which has stood the test of time well. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Amazing work! I see you every day. Great work! I Am Chaos (talk) 14:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC) |
False positive
I couldn't find the link, so I wanted to tell you that your revert to Burnin' It Down was a false positive, because I was removing a redlink. --2600:8805:2409:AB00:48C7:1E4:D06C:4085 (talk) 21:16, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- For the record, the link to the diff is here and the MySQL ID is 3000112. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
3 million reverts by CBNG!
Congratulations to ClueBot NG for accumulating 3 million reverts! Great job ClueBot NG. We appreciate all the anti-vandalism work that you do for us. Yoshi24517 Very Busy 19:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes! Thank to CBNG and team for lowering our workload and creating a feed that allows us to sort edits. L3X1 (distant write) 20:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Suggestion
Black Kite suggested adding "gonzo" to ClueBot's list of things to look for, per the discussion about an IP hopping vandal found here. Basically this user adds the words "gonzo" and "trump 2020" to articles in an effort to troll. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- @EvergreenFir: CBNG doesn't use a list of words to detect vandalism, it uses a database of hand-picked edits to learn what is and isn't vandalism. For things like that an edit filter might work better. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 16:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- @K6ka: Thank you! EvergreenFir (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
ClueBot III
Out of curiosity, is there any reason that ClueBot III isn't running? Elisfkc (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)