Misplaced Pages

User talk:89.172.239.85

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 89.172.231.228 (talk) at 16:00, 24 September 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:00, 24 September 2006 by 89.172.231.228 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Warning

Stop reverting articles to version of blocked User:Afrika paprika or you will be blocked too. This is your last warning. --Dijxtra 13:27, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Tiny corrections

"Krajina" is a historical name - that even you endorse. You Changed the name to "Croatian Krajina" from "Military Frontier" on one article yourself. You've had Croatian Krajina, Slavonian Krajina, Srem Krajina and Banat Krajina - all those composed the Vojna krajina territorial unit - its denizens were known as "Krajishniks". So, why are you complaining?

Yes CROATIAN Krajina, SLAVONIAN Krajina, VOJNA Krajina, etc. Krajina means nothing save marking the strip of certain land - equivalent of German 'Mark', English 'March', etc. The mention above were historical buffer zones not a real regions and it defiantely has nothing to do with the so-called "Republic of Serbian Krajina", a little terrorist qusi-state that occuppied Croatian teritory and expelled all non-Croats from there(some 250 000 people least) and displacing twice as much that you are referring as the suppposed "Krajina region". Find me one historical map of this "region".

Also, there were numerious cases, like in Varivode, a village where all denizens were executed by members of a Croatian paramilitary corps right after Operation Storm. --HolyRomanEmperor 14:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

In other words it happened AFTER the 'Operation Storm'.
No - but as a component of the operation. After the region was taken by Croat forces, many units (regular and irregular) and even armed Croat civilians harrassed the surviving population. Although those were only individual cases - their number is large and grasping. Besides, the Croatian Army formed a gap on Una especially for the Serbs to push them through it (these were Tudjman's words) - thus planning to conduct ethnic cleansing. Members of the army destroyed 700-year old cultural bastions of Serbs (monasteries) which is also a part of ethnic cleansing - during the actually operation. Aside from that, the Croatian Army pursued the two hundred thousand refugees even accross Bosnia and Herzegovina, constantly bombing them until Croatia was forced to withdraw its armed forces from BiH by the International Community. --HolyRomanEmperor 15:34, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
How it happened "as the component of the military operation" when the operation ended? I think you have difficulty with logic. As for the gap on Una, Croatia was obligated to leave it according to UN and Geneva conventions and also by the same international community you call yourself upon to. And Croatia was not forced to withdraw her forces from BiH because it had an agremeent with the legal presidency of that country to help them which allowed Croatian army to cross the border and engage hostile forces which were attacking Croatian teritory...this is also valid according to Geneva conventions. You still haven't provided where it is stated and proved without doubt that there was "ethnic cleansing" in 'Operation Storm' and I doubt you'll find any.

BBC - Croat suspect denies war crimes: Gen Gotovina is charged with responsibility for the alleged murder of about 150 Serbs, persecution, and the deportation of thousands. About 200,000 Serbs - many elderly - were forced out of the region during the offensive. That's the UN charge. Tell me if that's not ethnic cleansing. --HolyRomanEmperor 15:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Do you actually know the difference between being a suspect and being guilty? Is it proven? No it is not. The trial hasn't even started yet.

User infoThis is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.