This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lord Roem (talk | contribs) at 06:43, 17 April 2017 (→American Politics 2: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:43, 17 April 2017 by Lord Roem (talk | contribs) (→American Politics 2: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hello! If there's any reason you'd like to contact me, feel equally free to leave me a comment here or wikimail me- I should be able to reply fairly quickly in either case.
 Archives | ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Mike Cernovich
Re: "With these 7 sources" - did you examine the sources or was your response reflexive? The former seems unlikely as not one is usable for statements of fact. Misplaced Pages requires high quality sourcing for biographical claims. Please be more careful. James J. Lambden (talk) 22:42, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- @James J. Lambden: They're sources- whether or not you think they're good sources is irrelevant to the simple fact that they are sources. PeterTheFourth (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Unusable sources are irrelevant. 15 tumblr blogs are not 15 sources. That's a weak argument. Policy dictates what sources are usable, not my opinion. I note increasing irascibility since Trump's victory. If you're allowing emotions to affect your judgement in areas where BLP is concerned a break from the wiki is advisable. James J. Lambden (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Reverting
You recently removed my comment after you deemed it a personal attack. You did not remove the comment I responded to, which was attacking an anonymous user. You must not have actually read my statement. Please, don't spend so much of your time removing and reverting content if you aren't even going to read the context. You have no more authority than I or anyone else does. GG360 (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @GG360: WP:NPA is policy. Don't reply to somebody's comment 9 months late just to berate them for not behaving how you'd like. PeterTheFourth (talk) 23:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Twitter image
Hi, The Twitter bird image is, unfortunately, not free use. Suggest self-reverting. See Misplaced Pages:Non-free content for more details. - Ryk72 11:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
@Ryk72: Thanks buddy! PeterTheFourth (talk) 11:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Ethan Couch
When you reverted my edit today you out in the summary "editor is topic banned".
If you are referring to the "gender related disputes" aspect of gamergate bans, I was told this expired 10 months ago: special:diff/729932574
Since you and another editor were still under this impression do you known if there is a template I could paste at the top of my talk page informing people about that so this doesn't continue to be mis-stated? Ranze (talk) 09:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Ranze: Oh dear, what a terrible mistake. No, I don't have any advice you can use there. PeterTheFourth (talk) 07:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
American Politics 2
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.