This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Capitals00 (talk | contribs) at 16:22, 23 April 2017 (→Neutrality and clarification on 'Kashmir conflict': new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:22, 23 April 2017 by Capitals00 (talk | contribs) (→Neutrality and clarification on 'Kashmir conflict': new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)India: Jammu and Kashmir B‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Estimates
@Problematics: Hey mate. Since you reinstated the Khurram Parvez's figure of 7,000, it turns out that that content was actually added by me initially in this edit. But later as I said in this edit, it occurred to me that his estimate might also have been misled like the ones of Amit Ranjan and Seema Kazi, as both of them misinterpreted this source - . Also Khurram Parvez does not specify/clarify if he was mentioning war rapes, and more importantly, he offers no clues as to the source or basis of his calculations. Now we have no other reliable sources that give figures close to Khurram Parvez's estimate. So I don't think its constructive to have that mention in the article. Pinging @Kautilya3: if he is interested to take a look on this. Regards, Tyler Durden (talk) 08:26, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi there Tyler. I was reading Parvez's interview on Scroll.in and this is what he said;
According to our estimates of sexualised and gendered violence, there are 7,000 cases.
- So this is the estimate of JKCCS in context of the conflict and not the government registration figures (which include non-war rape) quoted by Kazi and Ranjan.
- This source also lends credence to that 7000 is the total of cases documented by JKCCS. Problematics (talk) 08:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Well, if they *documented* 7000 cases, then its totally fine. I will have to admit that I'm quite shocked to see such a huge number! If possible, can you dig up the corresponding content in the original report from the JKCCS site - . I'm not able to find it. From the 'main report' in that link, I could only find this:
Prepared over two years, this report is a part of the continuing work to understand and analyze the role of the Indian State in Jammu and Kashmir that has resulted in widespread and systematic violence including the disappearance of 8000+ persons, 70,000+ deaths, 6000+ unknown, unmarked and mass graves, and countless cases of torture and sexual violence.
- Cheers, Tyler Durden (talk) 11:11, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
References
- Ashraf, Ajaz. "'Do you need 700,000 soldiers to fight 150 militants?': Kashmiri rights activist Khurram Parvez". Scroll.in. Retrieved 2017-04-21.
- "Women's Resistance in Kashmir". AWID. 22 February 2017.
Redirected again
Found that this article is fork of an already redirected article after consensus, kindly don't recreate unless you have consensus for it. Capitals00 (talk) 15:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: have you read the edit summary of mine of this section? I have also notified on the noticeboard. Capitals00 (talk) 15:58, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Neutrality and clarification on 'Kashmir conflict'
See Kashmir conflict, "The Kashmir conflict is a territorial conflict primarily between India and Pakistan, having started just after the partition of India in 1947." While whole Rape in Kashmir conflict was India only. If we are going to include anything about Pakistan which is necessary since its 'Kashmir conflict', I think it would be neutral. Capitals00 (talk) 16:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories: