This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kappa (talk | contribs) at 02:25, 26 September 2006 (please help). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:25, 26 September 2006 by Kappa (talk | contribs) (please help)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| Please leave a new message. |
Archives: (Feb-May '06) (Jun-Jul '06) (Aug '06)
Novels newsletter
Thanks for doing that - nearly perfect - I did notice the user:Grey Shadow only got the link version rather than his requested "Full version". Small matter but I thought you might like to know. Thanks again. :: Kevinalewis : /(Desk) 13:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 5th.
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 36 | 5 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Ghirlandajo
I am glad to see you say that you have advised Ghirlandajo on his behavior before. It seems to me that we agree there is a problem but we merely disagree as to the solution.
I do grant you that Ghirlandajo has toned it down recently. I was pleasantly surprised to find that there were not as many incidents in the last month or two as I had expected.
Certainly it would be best for everyone if Ghirlandajo would take advice from his friends such as you. But now the ArbCom case has already been filed. Currently I feel a little warning from ArbCom may help motivate Ghirlandajo. However, if you feel threats would only alienate Ghirlandajo I am prepared to be convinced.
I feel the most important thing is to get Ghirlandajo to talk about it and acknowledge there is a problem. We simply can't make any progress if he feels we have no right to complain.
I do understand that Ghirlandajo is a major asset to Misplaced Pages and we would suffer immensely if he left. But if we can't discuss our differences then we can't work together.
I'm asking you, no I'm begging you, to help establish a dialogue with Ghirlandajo. Help him understand that Cowman, or I, or someone else who understands the issues, does not have to be an enemy. (watchlisted you) --Ideogram 14:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- The problem appears to have solved itself. Thank you for whatever you did or didn't do. --Ideogram 07:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Please explain
What does "procès d'intention" mean? --Ideogram 10:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
When you are back
When you are back please see Talk:Second_Rzhev-Sychevka_Offensive#copyvio? --Philip Baird Shearer 23:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Good luck
On break? Well, that explains things! ;-)
In any case, good luck with the exams! Kirill Lokshin 01:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 11th.
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 37 | 11 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| Carnildo resysopped | Report from the Hungarian Misplaced Pages |
| News and notes | Features and admins |
| Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 18th.
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 38 | 18 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
My plugin
Hi. I see in recent changes that you're using my plugin. A couple of points:
- You need to change your edit summary, as it currently says "clean up" (the AWB default) :) Change it to something short and sweet like "Bot". Unfortunately AWB insists that the edit summary box contain something otherwise I'd do it all programatically!
- In the last few minutes I released a new version which will remove importance= parameters from MILHIST templates. It's no big deal but you might want to grab that version, up to you.
--kingboyk 22:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
PD Soviet pictures et al
Are you back? It seems one of these German deletionists is opening a second front: . That is the same guy who is currently trying to get the Reichstag picture deleted on Commons:. Funnily, he is invoking the fact that there is no panorama freedom in France (). Personally, I think that since these statues are government property on a government site, there is no reason here to even invoke panorama freedom. So, like with the Reichstag flag picture they are mixing up German law with the law of the country of origin to construct a possible copyright infringement. But I do not know French copyright law. If you are also active on French Wikipdia, do you know anyone there who knows the French law so that , if this is indeed a new bout of lunacy, it can be stopped? --Pan Gerwazy 22:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Re: Adzhimushkay
Meh, names don't always make sense. ;-)
"Quarry" (or perhaps "quarries") is a more accurate translation of the Russian name, and hence seem to be the one more commonly used in English; I'm sort of hesitant to simply make something up just because it seems more sensible. (Not to mention that "catacombs" has a somewhat different sense in English than it does in Russian.) In any case, though, I'll leave the choice of name up to your discretion. Kirill Lokshin 18:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
100th Guards Rifle Division
Any input here would be highly appreciated; we don't know quite what to do with this thing. ;-) Kirill Lokshin 19:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
In all fairness
It's absolutely true that Tony Sidaway did make this edit calling another editor something unprintable, but four minutes later he removed it as "not helpful". I wonder if it might be better to withdraw that from the page rather than draw attention to it? David | Talk 21:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Please help
Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:25, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Category: