Misplaced Pages

User talk:Valoem

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bishonen (talk | contribs) at 10:37, 17 May 2017 (Warning). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 10:37, 17 May 2017 by Bishonen (talk | contribs) (Warning)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
New Message.
Super search:


Archive
Archives
  1. User talk:Valoem/Welcome
  2. User talk:Valoem/To Do List
  3. User talk:Valoem/Changes I would like to make
  4. User talk:Valoem/Archive1
  5. User talk:Valoem/Archive2
  6. User talk:Valoem/Archive3

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Luger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Juul (electronic cigarette) merge

The content was merged without the unsourced text and unreliable sources. Thanks QuackGuru (talk) 03:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

I sorry I do not agree with this merge there are plenty of reliable sources. Valoem 04:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
You restored unreliable sources and unsourced content. Please read the section below. QuackGuru (talk) 04:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Where? Also thanks for letting me know something I wrote was bold merge., I'll replace again source if needed, but I'm not see anything issues. Valoem 04:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
You didn't notice any problem with this edit? QuackGuru (talk) 04:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
It appears advert Emilynorelll (talk · contribs) vandalized the article I restored the original version I wrote. Valoem 05:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
I tagged the spam you accidently restored. QuackGuru (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Okay we can start a formal merge process. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

DS alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 QuackGuru (talk) 04:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Warning

Hi. I noticed you and RexxS at loggerheads at Talk:PAX Labs, and on each other's pages. I won't make the call as to who is right or wrong, since RexxS is a friend of mine who often helps me with technical issues. But I note this edit by you, where you strike out RexxS's support for a merge (!) with the edit summary "removed comment from RexxS editor has personal reason for voting deletion". Since you're an experienced editor, you should really know better than to tamper with another person's comment. Also don't attack them like that in the edit summary. What are you saying, anyway? "Personal reason"? As in, you think RexxS has a personal animosity against the company..? It sounds ridiculous on the face of it. You may well be topic banned from the Electronic cigarette topic area (see the discretionary sanctions alert above) if you continue to act like that. (Also, please don't post on a user's page after they have asked you not to.) Bishonen | talk 10:36, 17 May 2017 (UTC).