This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fresheneesz (talk | contribs) at 01:01, 1 October 2006 (→hat on arbitration). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:01, 1 October 2006 by Fresheneesz (talk | contribs) (→hat on arbitration)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)User:Messedrocker/Header Welcome to my talk page!
- Please add all messages under its own header on the bottom.
- If you need an urgent response, email me.
- You should also take a look at my MessedRocker On-The-Fly box on my user page
- If you leave a message here, I will respond on your user page. I expect you likewise to make your follow-up response (if applicable) on my page, and so forth.
Conversations are automatically archived the week after the latest comment on my talk page.
- User talk:Messedrocker/Archive01: November 26, 2004 - August 31, 2006
- User talk:Messedrocker/Archive02: September 1, 2006
Signpost updated for September 25th.
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 39 | 25 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for Semi-protecting Ed, Edd 'n' Eddy
I really appreciate that, thank you. Hopefully now other editors wont have to worry about that unregistered person believing that he owns the page. DietLimeCola 11:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Please look at the page history. If you will, you will see that DietLimeCola showed up there as a vandal a few weeks ago. When the POV and fancruft they added were deleted, DLC started an edit war on the page, using either sockpuppets, or friends with different user names editing the article from the same computer. Either way, it's the same thing. The article was fully protected for almost 2 weeks, during which time DLC appeared to become contrite and willing to work with the community. As soon as the protection was lifted (by my request), DLC began to edit the article using poor grammer and sentence structure, and adding POV. Take a look at the edits made during the past 24 hours, and decide for yourself who is damaging the page. If anybody is intent on having their own way with the page, it's DietLimeCola. Most of the kind of edits this user is adding have long ago been discussed and discounted by the community, but DLC is not willing to accept that. I have just finished cleaning up the page again: I suggest that you go there later today, and look to see if DLC has changed it again. Pay particular attention to the sentence structure and grammer, neither of which is up to Misplaced Pages standards. I and a few others have been keeping this article cleaned up and meeting Misplaced Pages standards for months. Now DietLimeCola has decided to "own" the page, and is not willing to accept the will of the community. Is this how Misplaced Pages is supposed to work? I think not. -- Elaich 15:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Unprotection of Bindi Irwin
Just letting you know I've unprotected the article on Bindi Irwin. Please check the article history in future. There is no such edit war occuring. -- Longhair\ 11:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
hat on arbitration
Hey, I added your comment onto the talk page for Arbitration. I use that link to get to arbitration, its just easier for me. I belive its useful, and commonplace to add those hats to pages - and I provided precedants on the talk page of that article. I'll use WP:ARB to get to it more easily - I'll leave it up to you to see if the hat is useful (it definately doesn't take up needed space on that short article). Fresheneesz 01:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)