Misplaced Pages

Guantanamo Bay Naval Base

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) at 00:53, 27 November 2004 (History: A Few Good Men etc does not belong in history. Moving to another part of the article.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:53, 27 November 2004 by Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) (History: A Few Good Men etc does not belong in history. Moving to another part of the article.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
File:Cu-map-Guantanamo.png
Map of Cuba with location of Guantanamo Bay indicated.

Guantanamo Bay (abbreviated as GTMO or "Gitmo") is located at the south-eastern end of Cuba, in the Guantánamo Province, at 19° 54' N. Lat., 75° 9' W Lon. and contains a United States Naval Base (116 km²).

History

See also timeline of Guantanamo Bay

The base was established in 1898, when the U.S. obtained control of Cuba from Spain at the end of the Spanish-American War, following the 1898 invasion of Guantanamo Bay. The U.S. government obtained a perpetual lease for the base on February 23, 1903 from the newly independent Cuban state. As of 2004, it is still occupied by the U.S., which continues to adhere to lease terms arranged through two agreements signed in 1902 and 1903, and a treaty of 1934. These terms hold that the U.S., for the purposes of operating coaling and naval stations, has "complete jurisdiction and control" of the area, while the Republic of Cuba is recognized to retain ultimate sovereignty. The agreement holds further that the U.S. will pay 2,000 gold coins (more than $4,000 in today's money) each year in rent.

Aerial view of Guantanamo Bay.

Since coming to power, Fidel Castro has only cashed one rent check, while steadfastly refusing to cash the others because he views the base as illegitimate. Although diplomatic relations do not exist between the U.S. and Communist Cuba, the U.S. has agreed to return fugitives from Cuban law to Cuban authorities and Cuba agreed to return fugitives from U.S. law, for offenses committed in Guantanamo Bay, to U.S. authorities.

The U.S. control of this Cuban territory has never been popular with Cubans. The Cuban government strongly denounces the treaty on grounds that the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in 1969 declares in its article 52 that a treaty is void if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or use of force—in this case by the inclusion, in 1903, of the Platt Amendment in the Cuban Constitution. The Cuban Convention was warned not to modify the Amendment and was told that the U.S. troops would not leave Cuba until its terms had been adopted as a condition from U.S. to grant independence.

The Cuban government cut off water to the base, causing the United States to first import water from Jamaica and then to build desalination plants. Less than a handful of Cubans, all elderly, still cross the base's North East Gate daily to work on the base; but the Cuban government does not allow new recruitment.

Detention of prisoners

Graphic of a globe with a red analog clockThis article documents a current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be unreliable. The latest updates to this article may not reflect the most current information. Feel free to improve this article or discuss changes on the talk page, but please note that updates without valid and reliable references will be removed. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In the last quarter of the 20th century, the base was used to house Cuban and Haitian refugees who have been intercepted on the high seas. Beginning in 2002, however, a small portion of the base has been used to house suspected al-Qaeda and Taliban prisoners captured in Afghanistan and elsewhere at Camp X-Ray, Camp Delta and Camp Echo. The most recent transfer of prisoners occurred September 22, 2004 when 10 prisoners where brought from Afghanistan.

The peculiar legal status of Guantanamo Bay is a factor in the use of Guantanamo as a detention center. Because sovereignty of Guantanamo Bay ultimately resides with Cuba, the U.S. government argued unsuccessfully that people detained at Guantanamo are legally outside of the U.S. and do not have the Constitutional rights that they would have if they were held on U.S. territory (see Cuban American Bar Ass'n, Inc. v. Christopher, 43 F.3d 1412 (11th Cir. 1995)). In 2004, the Supreme Court rejected this argument in the case Rasul v. Bush with the majority decision and ruled that prisoners in Guantanamo have access to American courts, citing the fact that the U.S. has exclusive control over Guantanamo Bay.

The U.S. claims to have classified the prisoners held at Camp Delta and Camp Echo as illegal combatants, but has not held the Article 5 tribunals that would be required by international law for it to do so. This grants them the rights of the Fourth Geneva Convention (GCIV), as opposed to the more common Third Geneva Convention (GCIII) which deals exclusively with prisoners of war. On November 9, 2004 US District Court Judge James Robertson ruled that the Bush Administration had overstepped its authority to try such prisoners as enemy combatants in a miltary tribunal and denying them access to the "evidence" used against them.

Three British prisoners released in 2004 without charge have alleged that there is ongoing torture, sexual degradation, forced drugging and religious persecution being committed by U.S. forces at Guantanamo Bay and have released a 115-page dossier detailing these accusations . They also accuse British authorities of knowing about the torture and failing to respond. Their accounts have been confirmed by two former French prisoners and a former Swedish prisoner. US Navy Secretary Gordon England has claimed that a Navy inspector general has performed a review of the practices at Guantanamo and concluded that it was "being operated at very high standards."

See also

External links

Categories: