This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Groiglery1217 (talk | contribs) at 22:54, 6 July 2017 (Nominated for deletion; see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/ClueBot NG. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:54, 6 July 2017 by Groiglery1217 (talk | contribs) (Nominated for deletion; see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/ClueBot NG. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion. Find sources: "ClueBot NG" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FClueBot+NG%5D%5DAFD |
This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (June 2017) |
Original author(s) | Christopher Breneman and Cobi Carter |
---|---|
Initial release | December 3, 2010 |
Repository | |
Written in | C, C++, PHP, Python, Bash, and Java |
Website | en |
ClueBot NG is an internet bot used on the English Misplaced Pages that reverts edits to Misplaced Pages articles that it identifies as vandalism. Programmed and operated by two Misplaced Pages volunteer editors, it uses machine learning and Bayesian statistics to determine if an edit is vandalism.
History
The bot was created by Christopher Breneman and Cobi Carter in 2010. It shares very little in relationship to the original ClueBot, except its name and how they interface with Misplaced Pages. NG stands for Next Generation. Since its inception, it has made over three million edits. The allowable rate of mistakes is called the false positive rate. That rate is hand-set by administrators and is less than half a percent.
Criticism
Critics have stated that the bot bites new users, by not being able to apply a human brain's knowledge to the edit, and leaving impersonal templates which deter users from contributing in helpful ways. Some have called it "rubbish", and tried to have the bot shut down.
See also
References
- Nasaw, Daniel (2012-07-25). "Meet the 'bots' that edit Misplaced Pages". BBC News.
- Raja, Sumit. "Little about the bot that runs Misplaced Pages, ClueBot NG". digitfreak.com. Retrieved 2017-04-11.
- "This machine kills trolls". The Verge. 2014-02-18. Retrieved 2017-04-11.
- "User talk:ClueBot Commons". Misplaced Pages. 2017-04-11.
- "User:ClueBot NG". Misplaced Pages. 2010-10-20.
- "Security Check Required". www.facebook.com. Retrieved 2017-04-11.
- "How does Misplaced Pages's content review bot ClueBot NG review Misplaced Pages pages and validate their facts? - Quora". www.quora.com. Retrieved 2017-04-11.
- "The Bots Who Edit Misplaced Pages (And The Humans Who Made Them)". MakeUseOf. Retrieved 2017-04-11.