Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JackW436 (talk | contribs) at 18:21, 24 July 2017 (→Adding references). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

JackW436, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi JackW436! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Hi. (Why did You get rid of My Dublin Page?)I'm not sure what your intent was in the edits above, but it is not normally appropriate to edit other people's comments. Even on your own talk page. Blowing past that however, I would recommend that you stop adding indiscriminate tables to dozens of articles. And instead consider using prose. See this edit for an example. Guliolopez (talk) 11:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC) (I would thing before you throw out these careless words to think before you type ,i am taking time and effort to improve wikipedia)

Hello.

RE: "Why did You get rid of My Dublin Page that means What i did":(Slow is-int even a word)

> 1 I did not get rid of any pages.

> 2 It is not "your page"(i know)

> 4 I removed the page content because it is redundant/overlapping with other content (in the demographics section and in the infobox)

> 3 I removed the page content because you had made no response to my requests that you consider project norms.

RE: "think before you type":

> I would request that you do the same. And consider what other editors are saying before making unilateral edits.

RE: "i am taking time and effort to improve wikipedia"

> Great. Well done. Please consider taking an additional 60 seconds to review and consider what other editors (and the guidelines) say about how we should improve Misplaced Pages.

> (If your time investment is to be worthwhile and efforts to be lasting, then an improvements you make need to be considerate to the norms of the project)

Finally. When responding to someone, put your comments below theirs. Not in the middle. Also, there's no reason to remove old comments. It makes it hard to follow if only one-side of a conversation is visible. Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 12:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

(I am not telling a lie when i put information on wikipedia and you cant hide the truth of demographics in ireland)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Odstock. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. –FlyingAce 16:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Adding references

Hello. Please note that all the links you add to articles as sources must be placed inside <ref></ref> tags so that they are properly formatted. Take a moment to read our introduction to referencing and our page on inline citations. The Manual of Style I linked above will also be of great help. –FlyingAce 17:17, 24 July 2017 (UTC)(This is racism and i am feeling discriminate against)