This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 165.121.144.242 (talk) at 20:55, 26 March 2003. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:55, 26 March 2003 by 165.121.144.242 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Recursion is a way of specifying a process by means of itself. More precisely (and to dispel the appearance of circularity in the definition), "complicated" instances of the process are defined in terms of "simpler" instances, and the "simplest" instances are given explicitly.
Examples of mathematical objects often defined recursively are functions and sets.
Recursively Defined Functions
The canonical example of a recursively defined function is the following definition of the factorial function f(n):
- f(0) = 1
- f(n) = n · f(n-1) for any natural number n > 0
Given this definition, also called a recurrence relation, we work out f(3) as follows:
f(3) = 3 · f(3-1)
= 3 · f(2)
= 3 · 2 · f(2-1)
= 3 · 2 · f(1)
= 3 · 2 · 1 · f(1-1)
= 3 · 2 · 1 · f(0)
= 3 · 2 · 1 · 1
= 6
Another example is the definition of Fibonacci numbers.
Here is another, perhaps simpler way to understand recursive processes:
- Are we done yet? If so, return the results. Without such a termination condition a recursion would go on forever.
- If not, simplify the problem, solve those simpler problem(s) by sending them to 1., and assemble the results into a solution for the original problem. Then return that solution.
A common method of simplification is to divide the problem into subproblems of the same type. Such a programming technique is called divide and conquer and is key to the design of many important algorithms, as well as being a fundamental part of dynamic programming.
Virtually all programming languages in use today allow the direct specification of recursive functions and procedures. When such a function is called, the computer keeps track of the various instances of the function by using a stack. Conversely, every recursive function can be transformed into an iterative function by using a stack.
Any function that can be evaluated by a computer can be expressed in terms of recursive functions, without use of iteration.
Indeed, some languages designed for logic programming and functional programming provide recursion as the only means of repetition directly available to the programmer. Such languages generally make tail recursion as efficient as iteration, letting programmers express other repetition structures (such as Scheme's map and for) in terms of recursion.
Recursion is deeply embedded in the theory of computation, with the theoretical equivalence of recursive functions and Turing machines at the foundation of ideas about the universality of the modern computer.
The Recursion Theorem
In set theory, this is a theorem guaranteeing that recursively defined functions exist. Given a set X, an element a of X and a function f : X -> X, the theorem states that there is a unique function F : N -> X (where N denotes the set of natural numbers) such that
- F(0) = a
- F(n+1) = f(F(n))
for any natural number n.
Proof of Uniqueness
Take two functions f and g of domain N and codomain A such that:
- f(0) = a
- g(0) = a
- f(n+1) = F(f(n))
- g(n+1) = F(g(n))
where a is an element of A. We want to prove that f = g. Two functions are equal if they:
- i. have equal domains/codomains;
- ii. have the same graphic.
- i. Done!
- ii. Mathematical induction: for all n in N, f(n) = g(n)? (We shall call this condition, say, Eq(n)):
- 1.:Eq(0) iff f(0) = g(0) iff a = a. Done!
- 2.:Let n be an element of N. Assuming that Eq(n) holds, we want to show that Eq(n+1) holds as well, which is easy because: f(n+1) = F(f(n)) = F(g(n)) = g(n+1). Done!
(Existence of such a function must be proved too)
Recursively Defined Sets
The canonical example of a recursively defined set is the natural numbers:
- 0 is in N
- if n is in N, then n+1 is in N
The natural numbers can be defined as the smallest set satisfying these two properties.
Another interesting example is the set of all true propositions in an axiomatic system.
- if a proposition is an axiom, it is true.
- if a proposition can be obtained from true propositions by means of inference rules, it is true.
(It needs to be pointed out that determining whether a certain object is in a recursively defined set is not an algorithmic task.)
See also
If you didn't understand this article then you should click here and read about twice as carefully.