This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zotel (talk | contribs) at 01:18, 6 October 2006 (→[]: keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:18, 6 October 2006 by Zotel (talk | contribs) (→[]: keep)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| < October 4 | October 6 > |
|---|
October 5
Template:Deprecated template
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Merged and redirected (as creator). The template was intended to be used while pages are transitioned to the newer dated system with more flexible syntax. I've replaced that with a tracking category and rather complex ParserFunctions to switch between syntaxes, since the simpler method is apparently undesireable. // Pathoschild (/map) 18:01, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Unnecessary, given {{Tdeprecated}}. Switch all instances to Tdeprecated and delete. Pagrashtak 04:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Why didn't you discuss this with the users involved first? —Centrx→talk • 04:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge & redirect. >Radiant< 16:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to {{tdeprecated}}. If it was used more we could just deprecate it... --ais523 16:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Template:Author
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleted per Criteria for speedy deletion G7 (author's request). // Pathoschild (/map) 18:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
I created it, it's superceded by Template:Infobox Writer, nobody is using it. --PdDemeter 17:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Template:user Earth
Category includes all users. Xiner 20:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Many StarTrekk fans, such as myself, see Earth as a planet which will eventually adhere to the United Federation of Planets. So the category is something of an avantgarde really. Other Wikipedians might also use it to assert their cosmopolitanism. RedZebra 21:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- I have no problem with Star Trek, humor, etc., but of the few rules for infoboxes, one is being violated here. One may argue for a rule change, otherwise this would have to go. Xiner 00:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Template:User Earthling
Category includes all users. Xiner 20:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep That's the whole part of the joke. Although, it is a weak one... Tennis Dynamite 21:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Many StarTrekk fans, such as myself, see Earth as a planet which will eventually adhere to the United Federation of Planets. So the category is something of an avantgarde really. Other Wikipedians might also use it to assert their cosmopolitanism. RedZebra 21:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Only the most anti-social of anti-socials, who can't even fit in with sci-fi geeks, would bother deleting this, realy sad Xachna 22:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep --Oblivious 22:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep it's useful as an alternative to national place-of-origin templates for people that are or identify themselves as stateless person --Lino Mastrodomenico 23:01, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Many user boxes are added pointlessly and as jokes, this is no exception. Cbrown1023 23:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep --Etherialemperor 00:05, 6 October 2006
- I have no problem with humor, pan-planetism, etc., so please don't make judgments. I'm just saying that of the few rules for infoboxes, one is being violated here. One may argue for a rule change, or this would have to go. Xiner 00:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep keep keep keep Zotel - the Stub Maker 01:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)