This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Journalist (talk | contribs) at 17:21, 13 October 2006 (comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:21, 13 October 2006 by Journalist (talk | contribs) (comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Template:Titled-click Template:Titled-click Template:Titled-click Template:Titled-click Template:Titled-clickWelcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Talk archives |
Click here to post a new message
RfB With A Smile :)
Username Warning
Per WP:USERNAME and WP:SIG, obfuscation of your actual username in signatures is discouraged. An admin who hides behind a nickname lacks accountability; it would be difficult to find you on the administrator's list. Please change it soon or request WP:CHU.
—Malber (talk • contribs) 02:56, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- My signature is fine the way it is. Thanks and happy editing! Orane (talk • cont.) 06:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Actually, WP:SIG says, "Signatures that obscure your account name to the casual reader may be seen as disruptive." WP:USERNAME says, "A signature should not be misleading." I don't see how "Orane" relates to "Journalist." IMO, an admin should be setting an example, not breaking the rules. I've noticed that you've blocked the username User:Orane out of process and without discussion. I've brought this to the attention of other admins at WP:AN. —Malber (talk • contribs) 13:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Celinecruft
Hello Orane,
You keep removing celinedionweb but at the same time, you don't remove sites as YouTube or else. They are unofficial sites as well. So either you remove all unofficial sites, either you display them. But if you keep some and remove others without much consideration, I don't think it is fair. celinedionweb bring as much info as YouTube or else.
Best regards, 83.214.216.95 08:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Youtube and Billboard are comprehensive databases about the singer. They are not fanclubs/fansites, which usually serve to promote a singer rather than list the good and the bad about them. That's why I keep including them. Also, youtube has become quite a popular source/refernce site. Billboard has been one from the start. Orane (talk • cont.) 17:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)