Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Flyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs) at 03:10, 15 December 2017 (→Semi-protected edit request on 15 December 2017). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This template does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

LGBTQ+ studies This template is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies Sexology and sexuality This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality

Template:Multidel

Semi-protected edit request on 2 June 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

remove asexuality its not a fuckin sexuality and never was gosh! 2A02:C7D:21F2:FE00:1141:7CB6:EA27:E46A (talk) 03:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template.—KuyaBriBri 04:33, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

It one hundred percent is a sexuality, please keep your terrible personality off of the internet. Snaileer (talk) 02:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 December 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please move pansexuality and polysexuality to the sexual orientation category rather than the non-binary category. Even though they feel attraction to nonbinary people, they are still a sexual orientation and should be separated from orientations such as bisexual or homosexual. Snaileer (talk) 02:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Snaileer, per our WP:Due weight policy, no. Read Template talk:Sexual orientation/Archive 9#Someone (another editor) should add Pansexual/Omnisexual to the Sexual orientation template and also. . .. Not only are pansexuality and polysexuality not recognized as sexual orientations by any authoritative scientific organization, they are considered subsets of bisexuality by a number of reliable sources. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

They are identified as sexual identities more than they are identified as sexual orientations. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Furthermore, now that the template has a "Non-binary categories" section, it would not make sense to move pansexuality and polysexuality from that field or to have them listed in both the "Sexual orientations" and "Non-binary categories" sections. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

By stating "should be separated from orientations such as bisexual or homosexual," it seems you meant to include "not," as in "should not be separated from orientations such as bisexual or homosexual." Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

• Template-Class LGBTQ+ studies pages
• WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
• Template-Class Sexology and sexuality pages
• NA-importance Sexology and sexuality pages
• WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles