This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) at 21:07, 25 December 2017 (Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.1) (Balon Greyjoy)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:07, 25 December 2017 by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) (Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.1) (Balon Greyjoy))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ed Miliband article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Ed Miliband has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Removal of Category:Critics of Islamophobia from this article and removal of category by User: Cpt.a.haddock
This article is in the category "Critics of Islamophobia", but there seems to be no source to this.
There is a discussion about the inclusion of articles that are in this category at category "Critics of Islamophobia".
I am trying to understand if a source is needed to categorize it also for this and all other articles. There are many articles where the article is categorized and it is sourced to a published article.
User:Cpt.a.haddock is removing this category from several pages even though it is sourced to published article. He says it is not enough for categorization. (For example, at Vinay Lal the categorization is sourced to this article: V. Lal: Implications of American Islamophobia, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, Issue No. 51, 19 Dec, 2015. But even then, the category was removed by User Cpt.a.Haddock.)
See his contributions: https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Cpt.a.haddock
The question is, is this enough for categorization? If this source is not good enough, I do not understand how this article is categorized in the category without sources. --Sebastianmaali (talk) 16:07, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Ed Miliband. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101001135352/http://www.labour.org.uk/a-new-generation to http://www.labour.org.uk/a-new-generation
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517002336/http://professionalmanager.co.uk/news/5527/ed-miliband-sets-out-his-leadership-vision-in-keynote-labour-conference-speech/ to http://professionalmanager.co.uk/news/5527/ed-miliband-sets-out-his-leadership-vision-in-keynote-labour-conference-speech/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130616010156/http://www.totalpolitics.com/print/167872/in-conversation-with-harriet-harman.thtml to http://www.totalpolitics.com/print/167872/in-conversation-with-harriet-harman.thtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100525050213/http://www.labourlist.org/ed-milibands-plp-support---running-totals to http://www.labourlist.org/ed-milibands-plp-support---running-totals
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101010195841/http://www2.labour.org.uk/labours-new-shadow-cabinet to http://www2.labour.org.uk/labours-new-shadow-cabinet
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721213729/http://edmiliband.org/speeches/leaders-speech-2010/ to http://edmiliband.org/speeches/leaders-speech-2010/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- High-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class University of Oxford articles
- Low-importance University of Oxford articles
- GA-Class University of Oxford (colleges) articles
- WikiProject University of Oxford articles
- GA-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- High-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- GA-Class Yorkshire articles
- High-importance Yorkshire articles
- WikiProject Yorkshire articles
- GA-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- GA-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- GA-Class organized labour articles
- Mid-importance organized labour articles
- WikiProject Organized Labour articles
- GA-Class socialism articles
- High-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English