This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NyanThousand (talk | contribs) at 07:11, 29 December 2017 (→Scope: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:11, 29 December 2017 by NyanThousand (talk | contribs) (→Scope: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
English grammar and usage
I've started editing for grammar and usage. Most of the issues I've seen so far are probably non-native errors, mostly use of the present or perfect tense instead of the past: e.g., "is" or "has been" instead of "was". I'm partway through the Origins section, but have to quit for the night. To be resumed. (diff) --Thnidu (talk) 03:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Finished at last. It ain't perfect, but nothing ever is. (diff) --Thnidu (talk) 08:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
W:NPOV and other issues
The article is currently bias to leftist views. Leftist subjective analysis is presented as facts such as Manuel Roxas allegedly erroneous reasoning for fighting against the Huk rebellion. Overall the whole article leans towards leftist views. Plus the current layout of the article including citation style looks like an essay. The article needs some work.--203.215.121.157 (talk) 06:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Scope
Reading the article, it seems that it encompasses the entirety of the Hukbalahap's activities from 1942-1954. However, should we include the Second World War as part of the Huk Rebellion? Most sources I've read on the subject (Agoncillo, Saulo, Lanzona, and even Kerkvliet, which seems to be the primary source of this article) differentiate between the Hukbalahap of the Second World War vs. the Huk Insurrection.
One can also argue that the actions of the Hukbalahap during the Second World War aren't the same as its actions during the Third Republic. During the war it was a force created as a united front against the invading Japanese; not necessarily as a rebel army. It was only after the events of the 1946 election, coupled with mounting unrest in Central Luzon that the Huks rose again, this time as an armed body with the intention of rebelling against the Philippine government.
My proposal, therefore, is to split the article. Move the information about the Huk's activities during the Second World War to the Hukbalahap page, or, more appropriately, Philippine resistance against Japan, and keep this article as exclusively about the Huk insurrection proper, from 1946-1954. Would greatly appreciate everyone's opinion on this though. NyanThousand (talk) 07:11, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- Stub-Class Philippine-related articles
- High-importance Philippine-related articles
- WikiProject Philippines articles
- Stub-Class military history articles
- Stub-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Stub-Class Southeast Asian military history articles
- Southeast Asian military history task force articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors