This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SmokeyJoe (talk | contribs) at 23:12, 4 January 2018 (Not a stub. Short sweet. Could be improved, but not particularly in need of embiggenment.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:12, 4 January 2018 by SmokeyJoe (talk | contribs) (Not a stub. Short sweet. Could be improved, but not particularly in need of embiggenment.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Misplaced Pages's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. | Shortcut |
 | This page in a nutshell: One has to deliberate and evaluate fully and then come to a considered opinion before giving one's opinions in a forum where one's opinions could be the subject of debate and conjecture which could reflect upon oneself and lead others to form an opinion as to one's opinion. |
Bradspeak, a term coined on the talkpage of User:Iridescent in 2011, is the formal, deliberate, and exhaustive style in which Misplaced Pages functionaries communicate in public in order to cover their backs and forestall any possible criticism, or any use of their opinion to further a wikicrusade, or for any other inappropriate purpose. Bradspeak is named, somewhat unfairly, after long-time arbitrator User:Newyorkbrad.
Scope-limiting
Bradspeak seeks, in part, to limit the applicable scope of a particular comment or decision thereby reducing its ability to be used outside of the most immediate subject of discussion. It therefore tends to be extremely context-specific. As a result, generalizations are avoided whenever possible so that any particular generalization—and therefore any particular philosophy—can neither be vindicated nor discounted based on a single decision intended only to be applied to a single instance. This exclusion, in itself, is not of universal applicability and has to be considered within the context to which it is applied.
The above paragraph is not quite Bradspeak, but it is getting close.
Diff-friendly
In order to reduce out-of-context diff use in on-wiki arguments, Bradspeak tends to be highly proofread so as to avoid subsequent revisions needed to clarify otherwise-ambiguous portions of the first edit. Making the assumption that some editors might happily drop would-be intermediate revisions, Bradspeak seeks to perform one large revision to prevent the need for further revisions that would naturally in and of themselves be taken out of context.