This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 05:41, 15 February 2018 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's Health/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:41, 15 February 2018 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's Health/Archive 1) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Women's Health Project‑class | |||||||
|
Women Project‑class | |||||||
|
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Women's Health and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Lactation consultant
I just prodded the lactation consultant article for being a puff piece without reliable secondary sources. Someone more knowledgeable than me may want to write a real article about the topic; I'd say WP:TNT applies. Huon (talk) 00:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi @Huon:, and thanks for bringing this up here. I missed this discussion, and the PROD. I searched for this article while I was updating another article on breastfeeding, discovered that it had been deleted, and asked for it to be restored.
- W.r.t. puffery, being a puff piece can be a good reason to delete an article about an organization, person, or product, but I have never seen it as a deletion rationale for an occupation. I've done some refactoring of the article and I disagree that it was a TNT case. Let me know if you still have concerns. Cheers, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 22:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Revisiting gendered categories
FYIMisplaced Pages talk:Categorization#Revisiting gendered categories: Let's have a clear criterion of "has or can have a proper article" --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Review on health inequities for marginalized women
PMID 29137869 is a recent, top-quality review that presents information about the effects of exclusion on "homeless populations, individuals with substance use disorders, sex workers, and imprisoned individuals", including information about how women are affected. The article is free to read, so please consider whether it could be useful to expand articles about women's health. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:09, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
International Women's Day Oxford 2018
In case you weren't aware, Mvolz (talk · contribs) has created Misplaced Pages:Meetups/UK/International Women's Day Oxford 2018. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Categories: