This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mz7 (talk | contribs) at 00:59, 27 April 2018 (→User:OccultZone: Done (using responseHelper)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:59, 27 April 2018 by Mz7 (talk | contribs) (→User:OccultZone: Done (using responseHelper))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Requests for permissions | |
---|---|
Common | |
Uncommon | |
Logs | |
Special |
Autopatrolled
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts Please read Misplaced Pages:Autopatrolled before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants are unlikely to be granted this right if they have created fewer than 25 new articles, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. Note that this right will not help you create or patrol articles.User:Cesdeva
- Cesdeva (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
I'd like to stop adding to the backlog at NPP please. I create articles consistent with MOS and i'm well versed on other policy. I've been signed up for the FRS for nearly 5 years now so i have a wide experience on article issues and the resolutions. I also assess articles for WP:India so I know the quality scale well. I haven't created any (or edited many) BLP articles but I am aware of the careful and thorough approach needed for sourcing and giving weight to material. Kind regards, Cesdeva (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)- Automated comment This user has created roughly 18 articles. — MusikBot 18:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Request withdrawn Cesdeva (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has created roughly 18 articles. — MusikBot 18:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
User:OccultZone
- OccultZone (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
- I am making this request after discussion on User talk:Fram#User rights and getting advice from Xaosflux. I was banned by Arbcom in June 2015, and soon my user rights (autopatrolled, pending changes reviewer and rollbacker) were removed by Magioladitis without any explanation. Upon return I asked him to restore these user rights, but he ignored the request. On Farm's talk page, he described that "sokpupperty case", was the reason why he removed the user rights, but such reasoning is frivolous per WP:INDEFRIGHTS, and user rights are never removed unless they have been abused, but clearly that's not a case here. Magioladitis was never a right person to remove user right even if there was any abuse because he is WP:INVOLVED with me as an editor who was seeking sanctions against me, more than anyone during the Arbcom case itself. His failure to restore user rights upon request further reduce any doubts that the removal was in violation of multiple policies and not done in good faith.
- I would request any admin to restore these three user rights (autopatrolled, pending changes reviewer and rollbacker) all together because I have already made the request for other 2 user rights on their pages by linking to this section. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:06, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- Done. I disagree with some parts of this request – sock puppetry is probably the most severe violation of community trust one can commit here, and its disruption touches many aspects of editing, so I'm not convinced that it was necessarily outside of administrator discretion to remove the rights (I have no comment as to whether Magioladitis was involved; that's irrelevant to whether the action was right). With that being said, the site-ban has been lifted, and absent direct evidence that OccultZone specifically abused these rights, I don't see any net negative for the encyclopedia if these rights are returned on a good-faith request. Mz7 (talk) 00:57, 27 April 2018 (UTC)