< Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 14.139.219.244 (talk ) at 01:27, 22 May 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision .
Revision as of 01:27, 22 May 2018 by 14.139.219.244 (talk )(diff ) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff ) | Newer revision → (diff )
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Cleanup : Merge Criticism of Misplaced Pages#Systemic bias in coverage with Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Coverage .Expand : *Expand lead a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.
Should there be something on Misplaced Pages assessment of itself - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
Find references where called for Other : *Discuss changing the subject of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. quality of Misplaced Pages , quality and comprehensiveness of Misplaced Pages , evaluation of Misplaced Pages , assessment of Misplaced Pages , appraisal of Misplaced Pages , perspectives on Misplaced Pages , reception of Misplaced Pages etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Article name ). Discuss overlap with criticism of Misplaced Pages and clarify the scope of the two articles.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
**DISCLAIMER** We are not affiliated with Wikipedia, and Cloudflare.
The information presented on this site is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.
You should always have a personal consultation with a healthcare professional before making changes to your diet, medication, or exercise routine.
AI helps with the correspondence in our chat.
We participate in an affiliate program. If you buy something through a link, we may earn a commission 💕
↑