This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shoester (talk | contribs) at 02:38, 1 November 2006 (→Please consider). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:38, 1 November 2006 by Shoester (talk | contribs) (→Please consider)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions made on October 26 2006 to Man Beast
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 17:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)WR Justin Eiler 00:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Please consider
Asgardian look at this Hello Can you please keep an eye on the edits of Asgardian? He is making POV editor and disregarding formatting standards on The Gladiator and Abomination pages. Thank you. T-1000 18:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Boru is awesome (talk • contribs)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:CovenantD"
- After your edit note "At least two posters put a lot of work into getting the article to the level it is" I went back and looked through the Hercules Marvel edit history to see if I'd supported the wrong version. After looking through your history of warring with everybody and blowing off good advice, all I can say about "At least two posters put a lot of work into getting the article to the level it is" is wow that's ironic! You remind me of my brother-in-law who expects patience and consideration from others but won't give same. You been at this two months and have exactly zero allies against lots of counter-editors. When people try to work with you, you turn right around and do the same thing you been doing or just insult them for not teaching you nicely enough. This looks like you're just stubbornly trying to win instead of methodically improving articles. (And now comes the snippy or faux reasonable reply where you try to show how you're better than me while indicating I'm obviously some inconsiderate dummy based on blah-blah-blah that I said. Get a clue! Notice how many people disagree with you.) Shoester 19:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- And yet you still couldn't resist doing exactly that. Shoester 02:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)