This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 84.191.238.105 (talk) at 11:54, 1 November 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:54, 1 November 2006 by 84.191.238.105 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Arbitration is a legal technique for the resolution of disputes outside the courts, wherein the parties to a dispute refer it to one or more persons (the "arbitrators" or "arbitral tribunal"), by whose decision (the "award") they agree to be bound. In the United States, the term is also used to refer to non-binding arbitration, a process in which the final award does not bind the parties.
Arbitration is today most commonly used for the resolution of commercial disputes, particularly in the context of international commercial transactions. It is also used in some countries to resolve other types of disputes, such as labor disputes, consumer disputes or family disputes, and for the resolution of certain disputes between states and between investors and states.
History
It is not known exactly when formal non-judicial arbitration of disputes first began. Under English law, the first law on arbitration was the Arbitration Act 1697, but when it was passed arbitration was already common. The industrial revolution and the growth of international trade however, brought greater sophistication to a process that had previously been largely ad hoc in relation to disputes between merchants resolved under the auspices of the lex mercatoria.
Nature of Arbitration
Arbitration is a proceeding in which a dispute is resolved by an impartial adjudicator whose decision the parties to the dispute have agreed will be final and binding. Arbitration is not the same as:
- judicial proceedings, although in some jurisdictions, court proceedings are sometimes referred as arbitrations
- alternative dispute resolution (or ADR)
- expert determination
- mediation
Advantages of arbitration
Parties often seek to resolve their disputes through arbitration because of a number of perceived potential advantages over judicial proceedings:
- when the subject matter of the dispute is highly technical, arbitrators with an appropriate degree of expertise can be appointed
- arbitration is often faster than litigation in court
- arbitration can be cheaper
- arbitral proceedings and an arbitral award are generally private
- the arbitral process enjoys a greater degree of flexibility than the courts
- because of the provisions of the New York Convention 1958, arbitration awards are generally easier to enforce abroad than court judgments
- in most legal systems, there are limited avenues for appeal of an arbitral award, which can mean swifter enforcement and less scope for a party to delay matters.
However, some of the disadvantages of arbitration can be that:
- the parties need to pay for the arbitrators, which adds an additional layer of legal cost
- although usually thought to be speedier, when there are multiple arbitrators on the panel, juggling their schedules for hearing dates in long cases can lead to delays
- in some legal systems, arbitral awards have fewer enforcement remedies that judgments
- arbitrators are generally unable to order interlocutory measures against a party, making it easier for a party to take steps to avoid enforcement of an award (such as the relocation of assets offshore)
- rule of applicable law is not binding, and arbitrators not subject to overturn on appeal may be more likely to rule according to their personal ideals.
Arbitrability
By their nature, the subject matter of some disputes are not capable or arbitration. Matters relating to crimes, status and family law are generally not considered to be arbitrable. However, most other disputes that involve private rights between two parties can be resolved using arbitration. In some disputes, parts of claims may be arbitrable and other parts not. For example, in a dispute over patent infringement, a determination of whether a patent has been infringed could be determined by an arbitration tribunal, but the validity of a patent could not (as this is a matter of public registration, which the panel has no power to rectify).
Seat of the arbitration
Most legal systems recognize the concept of a "seat" of the arbitration, which is a geographical and legal jurisdiction to which the arbitration is tied. The seat will normally determine the procedural rules which the arbitration follows, and the courts which exercise jurisdiction over the seat will have a supervisory role over the conduct of the arbitration.
Arbitration Agreement
- See also: Arbitration clause
Arbitration is a consensual process; parties will only ever arbitrate where they agree to do so. Such agreements are generally divided into two types:
- agreements which provide that, if a dispute should arise, it will be resolved by arbitration. These will generally be normal contracts, but they contain an arbitration clause
- agreements which are signed after a dispute has arisen, agreeing that the dispute should be resolved by arbitration (sometimes called a "submission agreement")
The former is the far more prevalent type of arbitration agreement. Sometimes, legal significance attaches to the type of arbitration agreement. For example, in certain Commonwealth countries, it is possible to provide that each party should bear the own costs in a conventional arbitration clause, but not in a submission agreement.
In keeping with the informality of the arbitration process, the law is generally keen to uphold the validity of arbitration clauses even when they lack the normal formal language associated with legal contracts. Clauses which have been upheld include:
- "arbitration in London - English law to apply"
- "suitable arbitration clause"
- "arbitration, if any, by ICC Rules in London"
Agreements to refer disputes to arbitration generally have a special status in the eyes of the law. For example, in disputes on a contract, a common defense is to plead the contract is void and thus any claim based upon it fails. It follows that if a party successfully claims that a contract is void, then each clause contained within the contract, including the arbitration clause, would be void. However, in most common law countries, the courts have accepted that:
- a contract can only be declared void by a court or other tribunal; and
- if the contract (valid or otherwise) contains an arbitration clause, then the proper forum to determine whether the contract is void or not, is the arbitration tribunal.
Some argue that this position is potentially unfair; if a person is made to sign a contract under duress, and the contract contains an arbitration clause highly favourable to the other party, the dispute is still referred to that arbitration tribunal. Nonetheless, the general rule does allow for commercial expediency; any other solution (where one first had to go to court to decide whether one had to go to arbitration) would be self defeating.
Arbitral tribunal
Main article: Arbitral tribunalThe term, arbitral tribunal is use to denote the arbitrator or arbitrators sitting to determine the dispute. The composition of the arbitral tribunal can vary enormously, with either a sole arbitrator sitting, two or more arbitrators, with or without a chairman or umpire, and various other combinations.
In most jurisdictions, an arbitrator enjoys immunity from liability for anything done or omitted whilst acting as arbitrator unless the arbitrator acts in bad faith.
Arbitral tribunals are usually divided into two types:
- ad hoc arbitation tribunals, which simply appoints arbitrators approved by the parties; or
- institutional arbitration tribunals, which are professional bodies providing arbitration services, such as the LCIA in London or the ICC in Paris.
Permanent tribunals tend to have their own rules and procedures, and tend to be much more formal. They also tend to be more expensive, and, for procedural reasons, slower.
Duties of the tribunal
The duties of a tribunal will be determined by a combination of the provisions of the arbitration agreement and by the procedural laws which apply in the seat of the arbitration. The extent to which the laws of the seat of the arbitration permit "party autonomy" (the ability of the parties to set out their own procedures and regulations) determines the interplay between the two.
However, in almost all countries the tribunal owes several non-derogable duties. These will normally be:
- to act fairly and impartially between the parties, and to allow each party a reasonable opportunity to put their case and to deal with the case of their opponent (sometimes shortened to: complying with the rules of "natural justice"); and
- to adopt procedures suitable to the circumstances of the particular case, so as to provide a fair means for resolution of the dispute.
Procedure of the tribunal
Matters of procedure are normally determined either by the law of the seat of the arbitration, or by the tribunal itself under its own inherent jurisdiction (depending on national law). Procedural matters normally include:
- mode of submitting (and challenging) evidence
- time and place of proceedings
- language and translations
- disclosure of documents and other evidence
- use of pleadings and/or interrogatories
- use of legal advisors
- the appointment of experts and assessors
Arbitral Awards
Main article: Arbitration awardAlthough arbitration awards are characteristically an award of damages against a party, in many jurisdictions tribunals have a range of remedies that can form a part of the award. These may include:
- payment of a sum of money (conventional damages)
- the making of a "declaration" as to any matter to be determined in the proceedings
- in most jurisdictions, the tribunal has the same power as a court to:
- order a party to do or refrain from doing something ("injunctive relief")
- to order specific performance of a contract
- to order the rectification, setting aside or cancellation of a deed or other document.
Enforcement of Arbitration Awards
One of the reasons that arbitration is so popular in international trade as a means of dispute resolution, is that it is often easier to enforce an arbitration award in a foreign country than it is to enforce a judgment of the court.
Under the New York Convention 1958, an award issued a contracting state can generally be freely enforced in any other contracting state, only subject to certain, limited defenses.
Virtually every significant commercial country in the world is a party to the Convention, but relatively few countries have a comprehensive network for cross-border enforcement of judgments of the court.
The other characteristic of cross-border enforcement of arbitration awards that makes them appealing to commercial parties is that they are not limited to awards of damages. Whereas in most countries only monetary judgments are enforceable in the cross-border context, no such restrictions are imposed on arbitration awards and so it is theoretically possible (although unusual in practice) to obtain an injunction or an order for specific performance in an arbitration proceeding which could then be enforced in another New York Convention contracting state.
Costs
In some jurisdictions where it is normal practice to award legal costs against a losing party (typically, common law countries except for the U.S.A.), arbitral tribunals may also have power to award costs in relation to a dispute. In most countries where the tribunal may award costs, they may also determine that the losing party has to pay the arbitrators' fees.
Appeals
Generally speaking, by their nature, arbitration proceedings tend not to be subject to appeal, in the ordinary sense of the word.
However, in most countries, the court maintains a supervisory role to set aside awards in extreme cases, such as fraud or in the case of some serious legal irregularity on the part of the tribunal.
See also
- Arbitral tribunal
- Arbitration award
- Arbitration in the United States of America
- Conflict resolution research
- Alternative dispute resolution
- Expert determination
- UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
External Links
- Latest Indian judgments on arbitration law
- Introduction to Securities Arbitration
- Parley Negotiation Software - A software to model, simulate and analyze conflicts
Footnotes
- In the United Kingdom, small claims in the County court are dealt with by a procedure called "small claims arbitration", although the proceedings are held in front of a district judge, paid for by the state. In Russia, the courts dealing with commercial disputes is referred to as the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the Russian Federation, although it is not an arbitral tribunal in the true sense of the word.
- Although all attempts to determine disputes outside of the courts are "alternative dispute resolution" in the literal sense, ADR in the technical legal sense, is the process whereby an attempt to reach a common middle ground through an independent mediator as a basis for a binding settlement. In direct contrast, arbitration is an adversarial process to determine a winner and a loser in relation to the the rights and wrongs of a dispute.
- Although parties are sometimes unaware that they have agreed to arbitrate, for example, where they sign terms and conditions which provide for arbitration without reading them.
- Swiss Bank Corporation v Novrissiysk Shipping 1 Lloyd's Rep 202
- Hobbs Padgett & Co v J C Kirkland (1969) 113 SJ 832
- Mangistaumunaigaz Oil Production v United Kingdom World Trade 1 Lloyd's Rep 617
- For example, under English law see Heyman v Darwins Ltd. AC 356
- For example, all arbitral awards issued by the ICC have to be reviewed internally before being handed down, which helps certainty and improves the quality of awards, but leads to delay and expense.
- For example, in England these are codified in section 33 of the Arbitration Act 1996