Misplaced Pages

Talk:Boxer (dog breed)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Feminist (talk | contribs) at 05:13, 23 July 2018 (→top: Added {{vital article}} using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:13, 23 July 2018 by Feminist (talk | contribs) (→top: Added {{vital article}} using AWB)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boxer (dog breed) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 14 days 

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconDogs B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Dogs To-do:

Here are some tasks you can do to help with WikiProject Dogs:


Archives

1, 2, 3


This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Boxer (dog). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Boxers are 'fearless'? Really?

I have had a Boxer in America for going on 11 years, and I have known other Boxer dogs during her lifetime. They were all dogs with great spirit, but the term 'fearless' strikes me as a kind of projection: NO creature on this planet is truly 'fearless' (if they were, they would die out very quickly). 'Fearless' also suggests a sort of shark-like robotic unthinkingness, which again is very different from the quality of the dogs I've known. As intelligent, perceptive creatures, of course they fear certain things. For instance, when we were in a mountain chalet getting very close lightning strikes in a summer storm, my dog decided that storms were dangerous and she henceforth took to a closed room or hideaway when a mere rainfall became something more. That is the intelligent response of an animal that knows what might be called rational fear: she perceived danger and attempted to evade it (with our loving kindness to help, needless to say!). All anecdotes aside, I assert that 'brave' may be true but 'fearless' is not a scientific or accurate description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:702:2:7140:910B:B13D:8CDA:5CFD (talk) 00:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Clarification under "Temperament" section

"Boxers are generally more comfortable with companionship, in either human or canine form."

More comfortable than what? 2602:306:C5F5:9990:207E:6ED2:B08F:9B94 (talk) 12:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Would it relate to temperament if a boxer has an ulcer type sore on one paw and so chews her other ones as well? Seekingthe news (talk) 09:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Boxer (dog). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Puppies are dogs.

Since puppies are dogs, then saying "dogs and puppies" is either like saying that puppies aren't dogs—which, of course, they are—or the redundancy of "dogs and dogs." So I propose a rewording from "puppies and dogs" to just "dogs," because by definition, the word "dog" is inclusive of all ages. Or in other words, old or young age is not specified by "dog" like it is by "puppy." (And to say just say "puppies and dogs" is like saying "puppies, and... some other species of animal," which is obviously not correct. But my edit was reverted, so I came here to discuss.

Thanks to anyone who understands this concept correctly and is willing to help form a consensus towards this correction by restoring, or supporting the restoration of, my editions to this effect. However, if editors absolutely feel the need to still be specific for some odd reason even though this article includes puppies with adult dogs, then let's correct the error in the more specific way by saying "puppies and adult dogs." Thanks. Thayve Sintar (talk) 08:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Categories: