This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KimDabelsteinPetersen (talk | contribs) at 21:57, 31 July 2018 (→Safety of electronic cigarettes: Do not tag the regulars!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:57, 31 July 2018 by KimDabelsteinPetersen (talk | contribs) (→Safety of electronic cigarettes: Do not tag the regulars!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 | Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
 Archives |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Editing Principles - some things that i considered for the ArbCom case, but on seeing how it developed into person-problems rather than content and editing issues, didn't put in after all.
LoS: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LoS
Playground: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Temporary User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Sandbox
Inhofe list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Inhofe
William list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/William
Created articles: Sami Solanki, Jan Esper
Linux Weight: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LinuxWeight
CCD: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/CCD
Fossil treelines, et al
This is really a "thank you" for challenging my thinking, and catching a dumb error, over at the HS page. What a pleasure, particularly compared to interacting with the Wikilawyer at the Other Page... Once again, welcome back, and stay sharp! Cheers -- Pete Tillman
about wind power cost per one installization.
can u mail me, how much cost of a windpower plantation of an single. how much energy output. how much duration of time to install. all total cost of an one install.
Welcome to The Misplaced Pages Adventure!
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
--
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
About The Misplaced Pages Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, KimDabelsteinPetersen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Amazing
See here if you haven't caught that already. Amazing.--TMCk (talk) 21:38, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, that is amazing... oh well, the diffs are quite clear. QG commented after the close, and reverted when i moved it outside the closure. 'tis amazing how rules are interpreted differently depending on who does it :) --Kim D. Petersen 22:55, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Safety of electronic cigarettes
Your recent editing history at Safety of electronic cigarettes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You claimed the content FV. Verification was provided. You reverted the quote that shows the content is sourced and then added a different tag. The content stating "A 2015 review found that these levels..." is a SYN violation and it fails verification because it is not a review. The undue weight is the source that is a SYN violation and not a review. The proposal on the talk page is unsourced. No sources were presented for "Formaldehyde is found in the aerosol but usually at a order of magnitude 1-3 fold lower than regular cigarettes. Under some scenarios it is generated at levels higher than cigarettes, and there is some controversy over the real world likelihood of this happening." The information about formaldehyde is already in the body of the article. You are suggesting on the talk page the formaldehyde section needs expansion. I can expand it. Tell me specifically what is missing. You can also tell me what is missing from the image if anything is missing. If nothing significant is missing from the image then there is no problem with the image. QuackGuru (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Please do not tag the regulars - we are not in an edit-war! Neither of us are on more than 1RR --Kim D. Petersen 21:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)