Misplaced Pages

:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/November 2006/Attilios - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:AMA Requests for Assistance | Requests

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Attilios (talk | contribs) at 18:57, 2 November 2006 (request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:57, 2 November 2006 by Attilios (talk | contribs) (request)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Wikipedian filing request:

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

Misplaced Pages pages this pertains to:

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

  • Answer:yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

  • Answer: user:Panarjedde, a notorius 3RR champion, is again and again reverting the use of standard (in the meaning it is used by ALL Italian communes articles in Misplaced Pages) infobox in Rome. The reason behind him is that the infobox is "UGLY".

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

  • Answer: Talk page messaging.

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

  • Answer: To make him conform to standard. If he does not like the infobox, he can change it in the devoted template.

Summary:

I'm not the first user complaining for Panarjedde behaviour here. Please try to let him conform to common rules here. My opinion is that he gets extremily stuck with personal additions to entries, and tends to revert any attempt to improve or change them.

Discussion:

Followup:

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

  • Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

  • Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

  • Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

  • Answer:


AMA Information

Case Status: Template:AMA case status

Advocate Status:

  • None assigned.