Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Werdnabot (talk | contribs) at 15:15, 3 November 2006 (Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Tawker/Nov06). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives

Vandalism??

What vandalism? How dare you accuse me of vandalism! Show me the vandalism! 71.213.73.51 10:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

help!

I accidentally blanked half the Robin Hood article. I know you fixed it when I did this to the Star Wars article. Can you tell me how to fix it? Thank you.

TS Edit Test

re: Unicornscan article deletion

I noticed that you have deleted the Unicornscan. Could you please point me to some justification of this?

Continuing the discussion...

On your talk page this time. You stated: "your current vote likely will confuse the hell out of a lot of users..." How many users who voted support actually understand the C# code TawkerBotTorA is written in ? Jcam

Retrieval

Would it be possible to retrieve the article somehow? I couldn't figure that out from the deletion history. Thanks

no offence

Are you a wiki freak???!?!? Your making me scared!

NO OFENCE!

Nathan Rosenberg deletion

Can you clarify the situation regarding the summary disappearance of the Nathan Rosenberg article?

The deletion log ] indicates that you deleted it at 20:23 last night, but your contribs list shows no corresponding entry.

There also appears to have been no due process leading to this deletion? DaveApter 09:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy delete A7 - notability not established... someone on IRC asked me if I thought it was notable and looking at the article... well, I think you have my answer. We often delete stuff w/o editing the page, it saves on disk space just a tad - any deleted edits are gone from contribs lists anyways - now for me to find some caffeine -- Tawker 14:10, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't really disagree with you. I was just puzzled to notice that the link had gone red suddenly. While you are about it, what do you think of these? -- Harry Rosenberg, Joan Rosenberg, Art Schreiber, Steven Zaffron, Nancy Zapolski, Brian Regnier, Laurel Scheaf, Jerry Joiner ?

regards DaveApter 17:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

bot advice

Could you suggest a bot, that could accomplish the task mentioned at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Germany#Please_check_for_wrong_umlauts? Agathoclea 20:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Congrats

AOL reverter vandal

For the past couple days, I've been dealing with a rather annoying gent from AOL (there's a couple wide-spaced IP ranges, but sadly they're all cache proxies) who goes around reverting User:Hu12's contributions with the edit summary "REVERT HU12 SPAM IT WILL NOT STOP UNTILL YOU DO". Now, I don't know the capabilities of the various bots, so I can't tell if AVB or TB2 can watch for this sort of thing, of it possibly I should ask VoA to deal with it with his, but I'd really appreciate it if you got back with me. Thanks! ~Kylu (u|t) 14:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandalbot mistake

Hello! The vandalbot tagged me as a vandal by mistake; I think that it may be because I forgot to sign a comment on WP:AIV but other than that I am pretty sure that I am not a vandal! (aeropagitica) 20:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Benton Academy

Sorry - I'll fix according to your comments.

Why was this deleted???

I did not have time to add the hangon tag to this page after it was marked. I had made links from the Benton, Mississippi page (the reference was there, I just added link capability. I was also referenced under [[List of high schools in Mississippi ]]. Again I just added the link ability. I seem to remember two links being a qualifying parameter. I also have about 200 words of text to be added. There are several additional schools in the same catagory listed on Misplaced Pages indluding Trinity Episcopal Day School, Southaven High School, Jim Hill High School and several others.

Esperanza Admin coaching - October 29

As far as I can see you are not currently assigned as a coach to anyone at Admin coaching. Are OK to receive a new trainee? Thank you for helping with admin coaching! Highway 22:11, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Flutterbloom

Why was the Flutterbloom article I made deleted? Did I miss something? The first time I made an accidentical copy of the lexicon but the second time I made sure it wasn't a copy (as far as I could tell. Randfan 22:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

It was deleted per notability concerns - please take a read there -- Tawker 22:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Iron-on (Band)

Dude, I created this article, saw it was a candidate for deletion, added proof as to why it shouldn't be deleted... and it was deleted anyway! Ridiculous, but why?! Slickshoes3234 23:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Take a look @ WP:MUSIC - I didn't see notability according to those criteria. The google test wasn't showing a lot and Plus One seems to be a very minor label -- Tawker 00:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

How AntiVandalBot recognizes vandalism

Hello. I've been using Misplaced Pages for some time now and I've noticed a lot of difference bots in my time but I was wondering how AVB can tell the difference between regular edits and blatant vandalism. I have no idea how bots function and have no intention of creating a bot in the future, but I'm just curious how he can tell the difference betwen the two. Thanks.

P.S. - Please reply here and congradulations on all of the awards, your adminship, and all of your hard work here at Misplaced Pages. Keep it up! // Sasuke-kun27 02:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I did not program the bots, but have been watching and interacting with them for quite a while. I was also given a summary of the then-list of criteria quite a few months back. Basically the bot(s) watch all edits, and parse every one through a set of checks. If the bot matches any of the current criteria, and does not meet any of a number of white-listing criteria, then it is considered a vandalism, and is handled as such. Amoung the white-listing is a list of all admins. The bots are not supposed to revert admins in general. As for the vandalism criteria, I'd rather not say. In general we do not want the information publically out there. But I will give one common example. Page blanking. Blank out a page, and the bot is very likely to flag the edit as vandalism. In general, watch the things that the bot reverts. Each revert triggered at least one vandalism criteria. So look at a revert, at what was done and what was reverted, and think about what it is about that specific edit that the bot could have triggered on. - TexasAndroid 14:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Pretty much, it's now a bot, we moved it to the toolserver and it speeds up things a fair bit. Right now it checks (or is supposed to) all IP edits, all "new" account edits and thats about it. Pretty much it's blatantly obvious things (etc) that get the vandalism, there are a few other things which I don't really want to tip off the vandals in a public channel. Feel free to email me though :) -- Tawker 18:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough. I can see why you'd want to have a private chat when it comes to these kind of things ^_^. I'll be using my mom's e-mail address (unless I make my own) but I won't be able to get to you until the weekend. Thanks. // Sasuke-kun27 02:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Are you a bot - response

How are you able to test AVB? I thought that it finds vandalism in a semi-random manner since it can't check every single article at once. Anyway the only reason I caught it fast was because I was repeatedly checking my watchlist back then. Gdo01 19:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

My Editor Review

Hi, I'm looking for feedback on my edits. If you have the time could you possibly leave a review or comment on Misplaced Pages:Editor review/Jersey Devil. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 05:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Get AntiVandalBot working again. Now.

Yes, even if it means taking it off the toolserver and going back to the old way of doing things. Vandals are blanking pages left, right and centre – Gurch 19:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the speedy response – Gurch 19:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Someone blocked toolserver. It happens once in a while. Oh, Tawker: this edit's for you.. ~Kylu (u|t) 05:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your hardwork and dedication to making Misplaced Pages a better place. I, Sharkface217, award you this Original Barnstar. Good job! :-) Sharkface217 04:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Your work with your bot is incredible.

Sharkface217 04:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Check other modifications by same user with bot

Is there any way you could do this? Often, a user who had a change reverted by the bot also performed many other vandalizations. If the bot could check through the user's edits, it would help clear out vandalism even faster.

Thank you for supporting my RfA

Thank you for your support in my RfA, which passed with a final tally of (56/0/2). It was great to see so much kind support from such competent editors and administrators as commented on my RfA. I know I have much reading to do before I'll feel comfortable enough to use some of the more powerful admin tools, so I'll get right to it. Again, thanks; └  / talk  13:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

WP:BRFA request

Hi - I've left a message here regarding a very short trial I ran for the pluralisation system. Thanks, Martinp23 20:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Responding

Hi Tawker. Here are the templates I use for the warnings:

==Editing Concerns==

#{{subst:test1}} ~~~~

#{{subst:test2}} ~~~~

#{{subst:test3}} ~~~~

#{{subst:test4}} ~~~~

Each has text and symbols, based on common use for many RC patrollers. Thanks for considering my suggestion. Kukini 02:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

The thing is we don't want to give the standard warnings - they sound way too much like a human is doing it - I'm well aware of test1-4, and of course the much more useful test5 :) - I think I'll work on another custom warning -- Tawker 04:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)