This is an old revision of this page, as edited by John singh (talk | contribs) at 08:13, 11 September 2018 (→Mentioning my account name unnecessarily by interlude65: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:13, 11 September 2018 by John singh (talk | contribs) (→Mentioning my account name unnecessarily by interlude65: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome to my talk page! Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing! Also take care of the following points:
|
Your rollback request
Hi Interlude65, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert any other type of edit - such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with - can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, use a manual edit summary instead of using the rollback tool. For practice, you may wish to see Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 18:12, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
November 2012
Thank you for making a report on Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Misplaced Pages and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. -- Mufka 18:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for the tip. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 18:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
No brainer
Is not an attack in any country I've lived in. I would appreciate you not editing my comments without my permission. Thank you.--Milowent • 02:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- Alright, I understand. Thanks for the tip. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 03:56, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, Interlude65. You have new messages at AxG's talk page.Message added 17:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
] 17:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Talk (Yes album)
Taking a short paragraph and moving it a little below is vandalism? I tried to present things differently. So if you think it was better before it's fine, but I don't "like to experiment". --Hyliad (d), 07 January 2013, 23:56 (CEST)
- Whoops! Sorry, I didn't know that wasn't vandalism, because it looked like it to me at first. Thanks for your good-faith contributions, but the reason why I reverted your edit is because it did not present very well. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 00:55, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spyro: Enter the Dragonfly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Star
Hi, I just noticed you gave me a barnstar the other day and I didn't see it until now; I much prefer to have them posted on my talk page so I get pinged, but thanks all the same. Rcsprinter (message) @ 17:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Interlude65 I'm Greg davidson I wanted to let you know it was a mistake hope you be a Wikipedian!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg Davidson (talk • contribs) 16:10, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Thanks
Jeoff G Davidson 14:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Citation Barnstar | |
Queens! G Davidson 17:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC) |
The Macintosh startup sound
Thanks for corrections. I was making edits three times in a row, and they all have been undone, hopefully it now stays for posterity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.255.45.246 (talk) 18:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
May 2016
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Meghan Trainor, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Misplaced Pages, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. There is currently a consensus. Thanks. Amccann421 (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oops! I warned the wrong user. My sincere apologies. Amccann421 (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- No problem. ;) Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 05:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Revert
I saw you reverted my edit here. Perhaps you would benefit from some explanation. The parameter "icon_nr" is not in use any more, but "sortkey" now does the same thing. So if you want the templates to function as you initially intended, you should implement my edit. Also note that your userpage is added to a tracking category, Category:Fix, because of this issue. I have edited hundreds of pages like yours, and all are very happy... Debresser (talk) 18:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- I reverted your edit because it broke the syntax, making it show on the the userpage. I'll fix everything to the new syntax whenever I can. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 20:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- I see nothing in the diff that could explain that. In any case, thanks for taking care of it. Debresser (talk) 20:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lips Are Movin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD 21:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
About My Post on Meghan Trainor's Me Too Talk Page
Maybe I worded it wrong but I feel that what I said on the talk page was relevant to the actual article, as the article itself refers to the song in the manner I considered erroneous. If my post did violate wikipedia guidelines, I'm sorry. If not, I intend to re-post it, as I think it is relevant to the article. Thank you KatarnLabs (talk)
I amended my admittedly poor post on the Me Too talk page when I re-posted it. I stated my complaint clearly and explained why it DID relate to improving the article, and yet I get this bit of extraordinary rudeness from you "Sorry, but no one cares what YOU think. Your opinion is not relevant here and it contributes nothing regarding making improvements to the article, especially now that the Critical reception section is not in the article anymore. Please do NOT revert my edit again.". I admit the first time my post was mainly opinion driven, but I explained myself much better when I re-posted it. Please respond to this post on my talk page, thank you. KatarnLabs (talk)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Interlude65. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Interlude65. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Meghan Trainor discography
Thanks for your revert of Patricia CV on Meghan Trainor discography. Changing information to their idea of what it is and disregarding convention/what source say (or even using unreliable sources to back up their ideas) is a habit of this user. Ss112 06:46, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Ss112: You're very welcome! Sounds like she's just another one of "those" users who base every single one of their actions here on Misplaced Pages on subjective emotion instead of objective logic! ;) Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 06:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hey Interlude, do you think there should be a consensus on whether "Better When I'm Dancin'", "Better" and "I'm a Lady" were full or only promotional singles or not? It seems editors disagree (especially this Hurricanebasketball7 editor), and the individual pages for the songs and the discography say different things. For the record, what do you think they are: Promotional or full commercial releases? Ss112 12:40, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Ss112: Well actually, the question we should really be asking here is this: where is he (Hurricanebasketball7) getting this information that he keeps belligerently adding to the article? If we could get him to maybe answer that question, then we could see whether it is a reliable source of info or not; that will help us in determining a consensus here. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 06:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hey Interlude, do you think there should be a consensus on whether "Better When I'm Dancin'", "Better" and "I'm a Lady" were full or only promotional singles or not? It seems editors disagree (especially this Hurricanebasketball7 editor), and the individual pages for the songs and the discography say different things. For the record, what do you think they are: Promotional or full commercial releases? Ss112 12:40, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Mentioning my account name unnecessarily by interlude65
HI interlude 65. May I know the reason why you mentioned my account name unnecessarily even though I didn't edit something for the past few days. It's OK if it was accidental John singh (talk) 08:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)