This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Deepak~enwiki (talk | contribs) at 21:50, 7 November 2006 (→[] GDP: thanks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:50, 7 November 2006 by Deepak~enwiki (talk | contribs) (→[] GDP: thanks)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Research and Analysis Wing
Hello, i would first like to thank you for the excellent pic on indian foreign relations, i have used it to illustrate the research and analysis page, please visit the page and suggest some improvements Legaleagle86 15:02, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you
 | I Seadog.M.S award you the edits award. This award goes to you for your constructive edits to Indian related articles and for your great pictures you have taken (expecialy the one of Shiva meditating. |
Raja Yoga controversy
Dear Hinduism Project editors,
There is a controversy on the Hinduism regarding Raja Yoga. Please read the debate on the Hinduism discussion page. Your comments are requested on the Hinduism discussion page to help resolve the controversy. Thank you. HeBhagawan 14:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks.
Thanks for your suggestion. Hinduism itself is a vast and diversified subject. I have no idea who has created it. I have no idea, how to find it out. Normally, history shows particular edit. I doubt, I will be allowed to remove anything from there in present situation. Thanks once again. Swadhyayee 05:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks.
Thanks, I will see what I can do.Swadhyayee 06:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Muhammad bin Qasim
- Revert war brewing there with User:Siddiqui regarding the same issues that you had with the article.Could you take a look?Hkelkar 15:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar
- Thanks for the barnstar :) Hkelkar 21:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Diwali
I was looking into the Diwali article and I noticed something strange. The intro paragraph said that Diwali was celebrated in Buddhism, which struck me right away as strange since I am rather familiar with Buddhism (East Asian at least), and I am pretty sure we don't celebrate Diwali. I tried to search the article for an explanation but I didn't find one. I was hoping that you could tell me if there is a significance of Diwali in Buddhism or if it at least is historical. Thank you, and happy Diwali! Mar de Sin 19:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the insight! Mar de Sin 21:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Urgent. I need perspective
User:TerryJ-Ho and user:BhaiSaab lost a mediation to me and are retaliating by demanding thatthe well-sourced article anti-Hindu be deleted. Please contribute to the AfD discussion. Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Anti-Hindu.Hkelkar 01:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:Diwalipuja.jpg
Hi, This image you have uploaded just carries a PD tag. Is it PD-self? Can you update the tag and maybe upload it to commons so that other wikipedias can use it too? Thanks! Shushruth 20:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Article translation request
Hi Deepak. Obviously, we need at least a stub on nl:Hindoestanen on the English wikipedia. I'll create one soon by translating the lead of the Dutch article, but since my knowledge of the language is quite limited, I request you to have a look when you have time. Thanks, deeptrivia (talk) 00:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Here's the stub. deeptrivia (talk) 01:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Image's copyright
Hello how are you? I just want to report you that your image, Image:Bedugul.jpg has been warned about it's copyright. I reckon you better check it. Cheers -- Imoeng 21:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well yeah, that is the point. We need the image for Hinduism in Indonesia and Religion in Indonesia. Could you contact the photographer, please? No pressure though. Cheers -- Imoeng 02:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you, I appreciate it. Imoeng 03:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Tata Steel
nice cpyedits u made. appreciate them. -- mowgli 18:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
FN Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier
Please help me with a WIKI article related conflict in the India-Pakistan section of FN CHarles de Gaulle. There is a user (UberCryxic) who keep on reverting unilaterally to sections that involve unverified claims (in my opinion). What are the WIKI rules? Please arbitrate. I do not know how to call for an arbitration. Thanks.
Indian architecture
Images you uploaded have been removed from this article and it seems they are about to be removed from wikipedia due to copyright concerns. This would be sad as they contribute greatly to the article. can you promtly confirm their status so they are not removed. thanks you --Merbabu 01:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reincarnation
In what way did you think the reincarnation photo violated the copyright? THanksHeBhagawan 03:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
The map of India in wikipedia
Dear Deepak,
I wanted to greet and congratulate you for making our motherland full and intcat on wikipedia map.
I express a word of gratitude for you for this remarkable work by your good self.
Thanks again & again.
योगेशः कुळकर्णी
Yogesh Kulkarni
yogesh@digitorq.com, yogamegha@gmail.com, swamiyogesh@hotmail.com.
- Well.. thank you Mr. Kulkarni --Incman|वार्ता 18:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair Use images
When I initially joined Misplaced Pages, about 2 years back, I did upload a handful of images under the Fair Use criteria without fully understanding it. Eventually, most of them got rightfully deleted while a lot others remain. Your dedication to remove images tagged as Fair Use but not meeting the Fair Use criteria is inspiring. I will try remove the remaining Fair Use images in my free time. Keep up the good work! --Incman|वार्ता 19:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Great. I wish others editors could understand that the matter is not a personal issue, just like you do.
- You can ask for the deletion of an image you uploaded (and were the only editor to make significant changes) by using the {{db-author}} tag. Best regards, --Abu Badali 19:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to load you with long message meant for you along with others.
Being a Hindu from India and having attempted to edit the article, my experience is, no worthy edits are allowed in the article and the same is tried to be monopolised by a single editor. To me, the article is projecting improper connotation of the subject Hinduism. The references lead to a book source page and is not true reference to the respective text incorporated. The article is victim of sock-puppetry. Incivility is used to discourage other editors. Even if, the layout or the text is otherwise good, the article has to do justice to the subject matter but the article is forced to be devoid of logics of Hinduism doctrines and created to be seen Hinduism doctrines as superstitious which as a Hindu, I object. In principle, the article should be free for worthy edits which under one or other pretext or by sock-puppetry tactics is prevented from. It would be apparent from the talk page of Hinduism that incivility is freely used to discourage other edits. Citations for the matter of general knowledge of Hindus is sought and removed whereas other matters without due citations or supported by improper or false citations incorporated by a single editor or a group stay.
Is this all done to get FAC? then it's wrong.
While feeling honour as a Hindu, if, this article is nominated as FAC, I in principle plead that it should be considered whether right cause is backed by right means? Swadhyayee 07:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates/Hinduism"
(To Mr.Tony.)
I have seen you applying mind to Hinduism shortcomings. My concern is HeBhagawan do not allow right connotations being incorporated in the article. My feeling is, it is due to the article having been nominated for FAC apart from his personal belief to be most fit to write Hinduism article.
I suffer a great deal of pain when Hinduism is projected dimly. I do not want to improperly glorify Hinduism but I want that right connotations of Hinduism find it's place in the article. Hinduism has capability to provide thinking for human religion, rather is a human religion. The philosophy imbibed in Hindus make them tolerant to contradictory views and contradictory customs. Hindus have a very large population. One may experience isolated incidents or groups intolerant to contradictory views and customs but average Hindu is very tolerant, co-operative and helping.
I am deadly against the psyche of any editor of not allowing others to incorporate facts of general knowledge in the name of citation. Though Hindus are strict vegetarians and believe in idol worship, they are not vengeful against Muslims. There may exist element of dislike but it's due to some other reasons. Christains and Parsis though non-veg. have excellent relationship with Hindus. This I am saying to support my statement that Hinduism is a human religion and I wish Hinduism is properly explained in the Misplaced Pages article.
To my mis-fortune, enough knowledgable editors are either not available or do not come forward to help. I am pretty sure that HeBhagawan is involved in sock-puppetry.
If you observe, he has to frequently edit his statements and yet you could point out poor language. In spite of this, he has been repeatedly involving in incivil comments against me that my English is not good, is full of grammatical mistakes, give a different meaning, my contributions damage the article and exhibit un-fettered authority by suggesting me to edit other articles or edit in other languages and is being supported by Priyanath to suggest me to write blogs or personal websites.
I have principled objections against Misplaced Pages articles being deprived of free edits. I believe, howsoever good one editor may be, he has no extra constitutional authority to prevent someone from incorporating additional facts in Misplaced Pages articles that not known to him. It's still worst to involve in sock-puppetry to make incivil coments to serve the malice purpose.
I do not know whether you have a chair of authority to help me or not but I found you interested in preserving standard for FAC and I wish you also hold views of significance of right means behind a right cause.
With due apology for long comments.
Swadhyayee 04:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Tony1"
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Hinduism"
Image:Thairamayan.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Thairamayan.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. -- howcheng {chat} 00:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Indian subcontinent
Good that you gave the reference. Meeting you after a long gap perhaps! --Bhadani 21:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Awesome barnstar! Thanks. --Bhadani 21:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:ChineseTributaryStates.png
Please clarify your points of contentions with Image:ChineseTributaryStates.png you labeled Template:Factual on November 6, 2006. Is it with the actual map itself or with the information on the page List of tributaries of Imperial China? Also consider that some of the unlisted sources could have been from Tributary states in Chinese history - in Simplified Chinese listed in the external links. Thank you, 24630 01:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I believe Sri Lanka paid tribute to the Ming Dynasty as a result of Zheng He fleet expeditions (a source is already provided) and Afghanistan, Nepal, and Bhutan were part of the tributary system during the Tang dynasty pre-Battle of Talas River. 24630 02:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Copyright?
- I saw that both images were under creative commons. I did not see the notices posted regarding this on the copyright problems page.Please guide me.Hkelkar 20:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- I saw creative commons liscense in both images and thought that it was OK.May be not.I commented out the images in all the articles where it was linked for now.Hkelkar 21:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- What about "fair use"? Like, the Delhi pic depicts Delhi. That is precisely what we are depicting on wikipedia.Fair use on Delhi article only should be ok.The sansad image is used in multiple articles so fair use it a bit itschy on that one. The akshardham image is not used anywhere so go ahead and get that removed. I hadn;t realized that wikipedia already has a good akshardham image.Hkelkar 21:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Pakistan GDP
Good catch ! I missed the headings and thought they were 2006 figures. Siddiqui 21:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well.. thank you :) --Incman|वार्ता 21:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)