Misplaced Pages

A Critique of Pure Tolerance

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Davemck (talk | contribs) at 04:12, 15 October 2018 (rmv duplicate parm). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:12, 15 October 2018 by Davemck (talk | contribs) (rmv duplicate parm)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
A Critique of Pure Tolerance
File:A Critique of Pure Tolerance, first edition.JPGCover of the first edition
AuthorsRobert Paul Wolff, Barrington Moore Jr., Herbert Marcuse
LanguageEnglish
SubjectsTolerance
Freedom of speech
PublisherBeacon Press
Publication date1965
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (Hardcover and Paperback)
Pages123
ISBN978-0807015599

A Critique of Pure Tolerance is a 1965 book by the philosopher Robert Paul Wolff, the sociologist Barrington Moore Jr., and the philosopher Herbert Marcuse. The book has been described as "peculiar" by commentators, and its authors have been criticized for advocating intolerance and the suppression of dissenting opinions.

Summary

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (October 2018)

The book consists of three contributions, "Beyond Tolerance" by Robert Paul Wolff, "Tolerance and the Scientific Outlook" by Barrington Moore Jr., and "Repressive Tolerance", by Herbert Marcuse.

Reception

Academic journals

A Critique of Pure Tolerance received a negative review from the sociologist Nathan Glazer in the American Sociological Review. The book was also reviewed by the philosopher John Herman Randall Jr. in The Journal of Philosophy and L. Del Grosso Destreri in Studi di Sociologia.

Glazer described the book as "peculiar". He credited Marcuse with being open in his advocacy of intolerance, but accused Wolff of being incapable of distinguishing "facts from theory". He disagreed with Wolff's view that "The application of the theory of pluralism always favors the groups in existence against those in formation", maintaining that it was contradicted by many historical examples, including the civil rights movement of the 1950s, and described his views as "politically naive." He accused Moore of advocating violence, and wrote that Marcuse appeared to support measures such as breaking up meetings and destroying the literature of his opponents. He considered it fortunate that "the means by which he might impose his opinions are not terribly impressive."

Evaluations in books

The philosopher Maurice Cranston, writing in his anthology The New Left (1970), called A Critique of Pure Tolerance Marcuse's most popular and disturbing work to date. Cranston commented that the book was published, "in a peculiar format, bound in black like a prayer book or missal and perhaps designed to compete with The Thoughts of Chairman Mao as devotional reading at student sit-ins."

The philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, writing in Marcuse (1970), argued that Marcuse's theory of the right of revolutionary minorities to suppress opinions is dangerous both because Marcuse's views were false and because "his is a doctrine which if it were widely held would be an effective barrier to any rational progress and liberation". He accused Marcuse of having "taken over from liberal and right-wing critics of the European revolutionary tradition a theory which they falsely ascribed to the left, but which was rarely held until Marcuse espoused it." He argued, against Marcuse, that the proper end of tolerance is not truth but rationality, and that Marcuse's proposals undermined the possibility of rationality and critical discussion. He also argued that Marcuse's case against tolerance made those radicals who espouse it "allies of the very forces which they claim to attack." Ronald Bayer, writing in Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis (1987), identified Marcuse's arguments about "repressive tolerance" as an influence on gay rights activists, who disrupted lectures by psychiatrists and refused to tolerate the views of their opponents as they campaigned for homosexuality to be declassified as a mental disorder.

See also

References

Footnotes

  1. Wolff 1969, pp. 3–52. sfn error: no target: CITEREFWolff1969 (help)
  2. Moore Jr. 1969, pp. 53–79. sfn error: no target: CITEREFMoore_Jr.1969 (help)
  3. Marcuse 1969, pp. 81–123. sfn error: no target: CITEREFMarcuse1969 (help)
  4. ^ Glazer 1966, pp. 419–420.
  5. Randall 1966, pp. 457–465.
  6. Del Grosso Destreri 1968, pp. 99–101.
  7. Cranston 1970, p. 87.
  8. MacIntyre 1970, pp. 89–91.
  9. Bayer 1987, pp. 98–99, 227.

Bibliography

Books
Journals
Categories: