This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aecis (talk | contribs) at 13:29, 8 November 2006 (Reply, WP:RA). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:29, 8 November 2006 by Aecis (talk | contribs) (Reply, WP:RA)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Your article Wild beasts was deleted after consensus at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wild beasts. Do not recreate the article. If you want a review of the deletion decision, go to Misplaced Pages:Deletion review. NawlinWiki 05:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- I see that you are having a bit of trouble adding a request for deletion review on Wild beasts. Is there anything I can do to help you? Aecis 16:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
It's just the normal thing to do. You wanted a deletion review, so you're entitled to have the deletion reviewed. As I said in my reply to your nomination, the band Wild beasts doesn't yet pass the notability guidelines set by WP:MUSIC. Perhaps I also need to explain what I meant with "without prejudice", because that's a bit of jargon. It means that I don't oppose an article about Wild beasts once they are notable enough, or an article that asserts their notability right now. It means that I agree with the deletion of this particular version of the article. I believe that at this point in their career, Wild beasts haven't achieved enough for a wikipedia entry. While the deletion review is underway, you might also want to have a look at our list of requested articles. A lot of bands, singers, music genres, record labels etc. are still without an article. Perhaps you know enough about one or more of them, so that you can help fill in the gaps of wikipedia. Yours, Aecis 13:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC)