Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Society, law, and sex - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mugaliens (talk | contribs) at 17:02, 10 November 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:02, 10 November 2006 by Mugaliens (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Shortcut
  • ]

Template:RFCheader

  • High-heeled shoe - Valid content present for approximately one year was recently removed by an individual, User:JzG, apparently an admin. Earlier this summer there was a violent dispute between him and other members involving what is best characterized as an overzealous desire to promote a single fashion ideal for men and delete all content and references beyond one standard deviation from the men along the fashion normal distribution curve. He supports his actions by labeling the content as "spam" when it's clearly not spam (no commercial gain whatsoever). Additional comments can be found at the page. 17:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Waldorf education. The advert tag seems grossly unjustified in the present state. In addition, personal opinions (editorializing) are being added to sections.11:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:White people - After a brief consensual stabilization (just reverted to it), the article is again under attack by people with a racist/White nationalist agenda that want to make it their political billboard, editing at will without accepting discussion or consensus. Many issues that should be in the corresponding parent article (Human race) or subarticles (White American, for instance) are continuously added to this one against majority opinion. See article history for details. 09:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Halloween#RfC - Repeated reverts of the article due to POV edits and links to unreliable websites as citations for the POV edits. -- 00:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Spliff#Request_for_Comment:__article_name - Votes and commentary requested for whether the article Spliff should be renamed (i.e. to "joint" or "cigarette (cannabis)"). 09:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Sex_tourism#Request_for_Comment How is Sex tourism defined? — 22:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Nun#Request for Comment: This is a controversy about whether a group of gay nuns called the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence belongs on this page. --Simon Speed 01:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:League of the South#Rfc. Are specific claims made in the article "exceptional" per Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources#Exceptional claims require exceptional evidence? Is it acceptable to link to Southern Poverty Law Center as the only source in each instance? 19:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Boy Scout#RFC2: proposing to add, in the "See Also" section, a link to Boy Scouts of America membership controversies. This supersedes the request below. 18:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Healthcare of Cuba: Should all sourced information be included, even when it comes from extremist self-published partisan sources, or should the article be written with reference to non-partisan academic sources and scientific studies? 11:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Boy Scout#RFC: Repeated deletions of any material alluding to exclusion of non-theists from Boy Scouts. 23:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:University of Santo Tomas#Lead - whether the University is the oldest university in the Philippines. 09:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Ménage à trois - Whether a drawn, black-and-white image depicting three people engaging in a sex act is an appropriate image for the article. 13:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Pforzheimer House#Recent edits - What Misplaced Pages guidelines or customs govern the "notability" threshold for items within an article? Is a "war" between two dormitories, which was covered in a long article in a campus newspaper, suitable for inclusion in an article whose topic is one of those dormitories? 23:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Advocates for Children in Therapy Does this article use irrelevant facts and unverified claims to subtly discredit this organization? Do the citations in this article support the claims they are intended to support? 23:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Sons of Confederate Veterans#Factionalization does this recently added subsection adhere to WP:NPOV and WP:RS? 19:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)