This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aecis (talk | contribs) at 23:51, 13 November 2006 (Edit removed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:51, 13 November 2006 by Aecis (talk | contribs) (Edit removed)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | Aecis is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
| Archives |
| 1. Messages 1-12 (August 2004 - July 2005) |
| 2. Messages 13-24 (July - August 2005) |
| 3. Messages 25-36 (September - November 2005) |
| 4. Messages 37-48 (November - December 2005) |
| 5. Messages 49-60 (December 2005 - January 2006) |
| 6. Messages 61-72 (January 2006) |
| 7. Messages 73-84 (January - February 2006) |
| 8. Messages 85-96 (February 2006) |
| 9. Messages 97-108 (February - May 2006) |
| 10. Messages 109-120 (May - August 2006) |
| 11. Messages 121-132 (September - October 2006) |
| 12. Messages 133-144 (October 2006) |
| 13. Messages 145-156 (October 2006) |
| 14. Messages 157-168 (October - November 2006) |
| 15. Messages 169-180 (November 2006) |
revert warring on Fenerbahçe S.K.
Hi Aecis, can you check history of Fenerbahçe S.K.. It's really difficult to handle. At least i can understad User:Profesor is using socks to revert warring. Other user is User:Scragnoth, but he seems to be just reverting. They have written a few things on talk page. But then a few new users has started to reverting just like Profesor, using similar edit summaries. I guess that, all reverters which are using "VANDALISM REVERT", "Vandalism", "Revert", are socks of Profesor. You can check difs and users also their logs, cause they are new users:) Btw, i'm a sysop on tr:wiki for more than 1 year. I know functions, etc:) Cheers --Ugur Basak 23:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Wrong alert, this is another sockpuppeter not related with Burak18:) Profesor is adding "Eder..." other one is removing. --Ugur Basak 00:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia
Hi, hope you don't mind me overriding your deleteprotection - I thought it would be the easiest way to end all this silliness if I just rewrote the stupid thing myself. Perhaps we can now just close the DR? I mean, as far as I can see there were no real substantial arguments against the existence of a stub article as such, were there? Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)