Misplaced Pages

User talk:NotAWeasel

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NotAWeasel (talk | contribs) at 13:56, 14 November 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:56, 14 November 2006 by NotAWeasel (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages!!!

Hello NotAWeasel! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Merbabu
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Misplaced Pages rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Personal attacks

With regards to your comments on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Israeli shelling of Beit Hanoun: Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. BhaiSaab 04:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. BhaiSaab 04:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

No personal attacks, thanks

Hellow there. Please cut out the personal attacks. Your contributions history shows you've continued with the attacks on editors AFTER you edited out warnings which show you've at least read them (and also suggests you have some wikipedia experience). Please comment on content not editors. Perhaps this message is wasted on you if you have no intend on establishing yourself as a respected long term editor, but if you do want to make constructive contribution to "the project" you need to refine your style somewhat. , ,

  • "POV forking"? - that's rather advanced for a new editor:,
  • if that is indeed so, there is a better way to handle it:
  • How do you know its "coordinated":
  • Yes, obscene language always convinces people that you are correct:
  • If you think you are right, why the need for obscenities? :
  • Don't blank Discussion pages:
  • regards --Merbabu 08:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

ANI

FYI--Striver 11:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for 48 hours

I have blocked you for making some rather ugly comments to other editors, as well as attacking other editor's religious beliefs in your edit summaries and page blankings. If you protest this block simply type {{unblock}} below this message.--MONGO 11:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

NotAWeasel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"ugly comments" are a crime? Attacking religious beliefs? Bullshit. And "page blankings"?? I never blanked a page, you liar.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2="ugly comments" are a crime? Attacking religious beliefs? Bullshit. And "page blankings"?? I never blanked a page, you liar. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1="ugly comments" are a crime? Attacking religious beliefs? Bullshit. And "page blankings"?? I never blanked a page, you liar. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1="ugly comments" are a crime? Attacking religious beliefs? Bullshit. And "page blankings"?? I never blanked a page, you liar. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

| "ugly comments" are a crime? Attacking religious beliefs? Bullshit. And "page blankings"?? I never blanked a page, you liar.

I love how MONGO's illegal block and bullshit lies are now being used to attack me. Really. Wonderful fucking place you've got here. Should we all just bow down to the pagan altar at Mecca and get it over with please?

Category: