Misplaced Pages

Talk:Comparison of text editors

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mathelerner (talk | contribs) at 17:38, 31 January 2019 (Sorting yields incorrect orders.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:38, 31 January 2019 by Mathelerner (talk | contribs) (Sorting yields incorrect orders.: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconSoftware: Computing List‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Archives
Archive 1Archive 2


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Missing lines in tables for Sublime Text

Please, could someone look at the tables and add the missing lines for Sublime Text (at least in two tables)? I have no idea why it's not there. Thanks.

ISO-8859 in Notepad++ v 5.5

Current Version of Notepad++ seems not to support ISO-8859. 25 September 2009.

Programmer's File Editor

PFE is a fully featured notepad replacement for Windows, quite popular in the 1990's and at the turn of the millenium. The homepage is here, but as development ceased in 2000 its eligibility for inclusion in the comparison list is debatable. --Lmstearn (talk) --Lmstearn (talk) 05:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)15:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Comparison of text editors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Appropriate to include Midnight Commander text editor?

I was surprised to see that Midnight Commander's text editor, mcedit, wasn't already presented here, and wondered if the omission was intentional since it is one of the more venerable such programs. While several of the tables listing more advanced features would not apply, that doesn't exclude similar CLI editors like joe, nano, and vim from being present, which makes me think this is just an oversight. I'll add mcedit to the page shortly, but if that contradicts an earlier decision or rubs someone the wrong way, please explain here and I'll either convince you otherwise or revert my changes.

Thank you. —Peter J. Mello (talkcontribs) 03:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Like anyone else's favorite editor, mcedit is subject to the same guidelines on notability and reliable sources TEDickey (talk) 15:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

64-bit nativ Version is main part for large memory support

Most Editors have no 64Bit Version and no large Memory support greater than 32-bit with 2 or 4GByte

64Bit nativ Version should be a Feature for Tables. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:810B:C53F:B9E8:4851:C258:A67A:DC31 (talk) 12:05, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

There is already a column for Large File Support in the table "Extra features". Large file support does not require compiling for 64-bit processor. Even an 8-bit processor can handle 64-bit values. --PauliKL (talk) 11:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Sorting yields incorrect orders.

Two examples: The properties "Software Licenses" and "Open Source" are wonderfully coloured, but are not consistently sorted in the way the colour proposes to do (green <=> red). I do not know of any possibility to make table columns sortable by colours, but I might have missed one. Since I'm not good in Sortable Tables, I would ask you to make the changes needed. Many thanks in advance.

Categories: