User talk:Factanista - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PaxEquilibrium (talk | contribs) at 19:32, 16 November 2006 (Re: Why have you removed the tags?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:32, 16 November 2006 by PaxEquilibrium (talk | contribs) (Re: Why have you removed the tags?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Hello Factanista! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Alternatively, feel free to ask me on my talk page as well. :) Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, it is strongly encouraged to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you associate with Misplaced Pages and its community. Happy Editing! —Mir l e n 04:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Getting Started
Misplaced Pages Tutorial • The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Middle-earth WikiProject

Hello, Factanista!

Thank you for your contributions to a Tolkien-related article. If you are interested, feel free to join WikiProject Middle-earth, a WikiProject focused on improving Tolkien-related articles in Misplaced Pages. We would be glad to have you join in the effort!

Here're some good links and subpages related to the WikiProject.

v t e WikiProject Middle-earth subpages
Project:	Front page Main discussion Standards Outline Assessment Templates Images Popular pages

If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to ask on our talk page.

Thank you for your contributions and have fun editing! (Your edits to The Silmarillion-related articles were very helpful; it's always nice to have another Sil-interested editor around Misplaced Pages ^^.) —Mir l e n 04:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry, we don't bite. ;) As long as you read the guidelines and policies, I think you'll be fine. If you need any help around Misplaced Pages, feel free to ask me! Or if you want to just stop by and say hi, that's fine too. —Mir l e n 22:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I signed up for WikiProject Middle-earth and I'll look around...hopefully you will be patient with me. :D --Factanista 04:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

I promise. :) —Mir l e n 05:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Tolkien terminology

Hey there, could you give your comments considering this issue here? (I'll even hand out free chocolate! ;) Surely you can't resist that...^^) It's about standardizing terminology usage in Tolkien articles, so it's crucial and a consensus is needed. Thanks! —Mir l e n 05:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Enjoy! —**Mir l e n** 22:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

As promised. Thanks for replying! :) —Mir l e n 22:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

LOL! Thanks. ;)--Factanista 00:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

No problem. Digitalized/cyber chocolate, who can resist? It just can't compare to the ones in real life, right? ;) —Mir l e n 02:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Stop

If you will go on to vandalise my contribution I will report you to and administrator. I remebere you that there is a standard rule for historic names, so "Sabbionciello" is correct (article Giovanni Luppis). It was in use under the Republic of Ragusa (official languge was Italian) and under Austria. Don't insist to impose unsupported theories on Marco Polo. You must give sources for your thories. Stop with others edit war, with no discussion.--Giovanni Giove 23:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do report me. All the administrator will be you enforcing your POV and erasing links while putting non-existant ones. There is no article named "Sabbionciello" there is one called "Pelješac". Personally I don't see what is your problem there since both names are up. As for Ragusa the official language was not Italian it was Latin while the common language was Croatian(also referred as Slavonic or Illyric). --Factanista 16:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I've replied

The response's there. --PaxEquilibrium 19:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I will reply soon, don't worry. ;) --Factanista 19:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I know - I'm just used to a quicker pace and just remindin' ya. :) Cheers! --PaxEquilibrium 00:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Glorious struggle against Vandalism

According to this article's history, it has been repeatedly vandalized in recent time. This is classified as plain removal, and is to be as per Misplaced Pages:Vandalism reverted on sight and reported at Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism, or any administrator on notice. --PaxEquilibrium 19:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, it seems I shall have to look into it. Thanks once again. --Factanista 15:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Np. If you need anything at all, please, don't be a stranger. Cheers! --PaxEquilibrium 19:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Tesko je

Tesko je nesto prominit na Wiki u vezi naseg marka. Bolje i pametnije je pustit taljane namiru. Mene to muti kao i tebe, jer nije fair. Nije nikakva propaganda na nas racun nego bas njihova propaganda da je bio samo talijan. Borio sam se i ja kao ti. Gurao da se baren spomeni neke verzije (kako pise na drugim webstranicima) da je ipak moguce da je covjek bio dalmatinac pa i cak slaven po krvi. Kao evergreen kaze, Columbo ima 4 verzije, Spanjolac, Taljan itd... pa zasto nemore Polo imat baren dvije.

Nestima to taljanima jer su izgubili columba, vecina misle da je bio spanjolac. A sad da je polo bio nas mora da isto ih dira haha. Ja mislim da je to razlog. To su ipak dva velikana.

Vidit ces i sam da ima i mali broj srba koji mecu edit na sve hrvarske stranice, to je bio problem jer ovde moze svak minjat kako god on hoce. Vecina srba ovde su realni i dosta su fair, naprimjer Pax i Panonian su najfairiji. Ima mali broj drugih koji nisu ...ali sta mozes. A ima i nasih tako o Tesli da je hrvat a njihovi kako si boscovich i andric srbi. Gluposti ali neko dode to krivo, negdi je citao i nemoze to brisat iz glave. Isto ti taljani koji ne razumio da su hrvati minjali imena i spadali pod venecijion.

Pozdrav iz Australije Jagoda 1 02:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Hvala. Nije problem u tome jel Polo bio Talijan ili Hrvat (moje misljenje jest da je ocito da nije bio nijedno) nego u tome da se u clanku odrazava neutralnost. Polo iskreno govoreci i nije bas toliko vazan za Hrvatsku i hrvatsku kulturu, stovise uopce ni ne postoji nikakva tradicija o njemu i njegovoj bilo kakvoj povezanosti s hrvatskim krajevima...barem u smislu kakvo bi neki zeljeli, iako je vjerojatno bio korijenima iz okolice Sibenika i Korcule. --Factanista 15:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Factanista, navrati na hr.wiki.
Za Paxa i Panoniana... neću se složit sa Jagodon. Profinjenijeg su ričnika, ali ideje su im druge.
Vidin, i ti si se sria sa talijanskim iredentistima na wikipediji i njihovim svojatanjima. Kubura 09:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Sreo sam Paxa, Pannoniana nisam. Sto se tice ovih Talijana meni se cini kao da je to sve jedan user...doduse mozda dva ali cini mi se da imaju dosta klonova. Na hr.wiki odem tu i tamo, nisam registriran al' napravim koju izmjenu tu i tamo. Planiram jednom kad budem imao vise vremena preveti neke clanke i prebaciti ih ovdje na en.wiki. Pozdrav. --Factanista 15:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Koje ideje? Drukcije od koga?:) --PaxEquilibrium 11:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Treba neko da napravi neutralan clanak za Marka Pola. Ima mnogo dokaza da je mozda bio Hrvat i to se govorilo u ona vremena ne samo sad. Nije neka nova politika vjeruj meni. Istina je nije on bas potreban nasem narodu, niti je nase bas briga da ga preuzmu sebi. Ima istine i to se treba pisat, isto kako neki kazu da je Colubus bio Talijan , pa mozda i Spanjolac itd...to nije nitko izmislio --ima proof da je moguce. U vezi Paxa i Pane..decki su dobri, nemaju oni bas Srpski pov. Jagoda 1 21:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

request

Hello! I`ve got one request for you. I collect words in various languages. Now I`m looking for word "sugar" in other languages, but I can`t find an Andalusian dictionary. I`ve got counterparts of word "sugar" in Japanese, Ahmaric, Thai, Georgian and Chinese, so can you write me what is "sugar" in Bunjevac language? I`ve got this word in 383 languages and dialects of many regions and countries in the world so it is very important for me! Thank you very much! Szoltys <talk>

It's the same as in Croatian or Serbian - 'šečer'. Pronounced as 'she-cher'. 'she-' as in sheriff and '-cher' as in cherry. --Factanista 15:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Template

See - since you already have one your own. --PaxEquilibrium 20:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I know about. There is another one too which I had at first but I don't like either of those, thats why I decided to make one of my own. ;) --Factanista 20:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Jel?

"and I will report you for 3RR and vandalising"

Pa ti mene ne možeš prijaviti za 3rr, jer ga ja nisam prekršio. Iako je komplikovano popunjavati taj formular za prijavu 3rr, prijaviću te u toku dana sigurno samo da malo budeš blokiran i da oladiš malo jajca od tog nacionalizma. PANONIAN (talk) 17:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Mogu, mogu, I ti si ga preksrio. I o kojem ti to nacionalizmu pricas? Pa ti i Estavisti ste ti koji inzistirate da je hrvatska verzija njegovog imena "netocna" i "kroatizirana" sto je cisti POV i nacionalizam. Ajd smiri zivce i popij tabletu. --Factanista 17:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Several notes: 1. Yah can't report him - he did not brake the rule and 2. That's not vandalism, but content dispute. Just a reminder of wiki-rules. Cheers! --PaxEquilibrium 18:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

We shall see. This is classic content dispute as I understand it. --Factanista 18:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Could you please stop to violate 3RR repeatedly, after several warnings. Please read the rule (I reported you, I'm sorry but I'm here only to fulfill wikipedia's policy). Cheers and hope you're not angry. --PaxEquilibrium 19:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry I cannot. This is a content dispute. I find it unfair that you are trying to enforce this POV while I am being reported and I am sorry that you decided to go along with Panonian and Eastivisti with this. I considered you rational, maybe I was wrong? And no I am not angry, why would I be? --Factanista 19:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I am not even in the dispute. I only tried to orchestrate a compromise between the two warring sides (you on one and PANONIAN and Estavisti on the other). What do you mean "you cannot"? You cannot follow rules? --PaxEquilibrium 19:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

That was not a compromise, thats the same thing formulated a bit differently. And no I cannot follow rules in this instance. When three different users are trying to enforce POV and it is obvious that I need to break 3RR rule as I am in disatadvantage. --Factanista 19:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Why have you removed the tags?

I have answered each and every question of yours a long time ago. I reminded you and you said you will answer me. Then I waited some more and added to the talk pages that you're not replying (while obviously active) and waited some more. Then (now) I removed the tags. I apologize if you considered that unorthodox, but that seemed the reasonable thing to do. --PaxEquilibrium 19:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)